Posted under General
Sessyoin_Kiara said:
It's bestiality, borderline content. Posts are approved individually, usually by different individuals.
Fair enough, and thanks for giving it a second look too. Checking again, it looks like minotaur pics actually fall under "furry with non-furry" rather than "bestiality". Subtle distinction, I guess.
post #7311055
Is this just too loli-adjacent for DB'ers or something? I just thought it was cute, not even in a sexual sort of way. And there's stuff approved in this same sort of style from this artist, of this character.
Edit: Apparently the head/face is weird in an ugly way to people. I don't really see it. When I think of weird heads it's definitely https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=kasuya_baian that comes to me lately.
Updated
Windsofgold said:
post #7311055
Is this just too loli-adjacent for DB'ers or something? I just thought it was cute, not even in a sexual sort of way. And there's stuff approved in this same sort of style from this artist, of this character.Edit: Apparently the head/face is weird in an ugly way to people. I don't really see it. When I think of weird heads it's definitely https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=kasuya_baian that comes to me lately.
In my case it's the legs angle to the rest of body making no sense. On the topic of loli art, it isn't necessarily deletable, just anything with 'loli' tag is hidden from regular members.
Hello.
I noticed that the following illustrations I uploaded have not been approved for more than three days, I hope you can help me approve them, I would appreciate it, thank you so much.
post #6391876
post #6388657
post #5222412
post #6382631
post #5245415
post #5220199
post #5220083
post #5220106
Alabel said:
I can't help but notice that your entire activity and uploads are only connected to one artist, with new art being not even taken from a website. That being said, some of these are of insufficient quality while other just didn't garner enough interest.
Thank you for your reply. I am very sorry, I have added the source URL and I hope that more people will notice the creation of another artist for this work of Fruits Basket, as there are so few artists who draw it. Thanks.
Alabel said:
In my case it's the legs angle to the rest of body making no sense. On the topic of loli art, it isn't necessarily deletable, just anything with 'loli' tag is hidden from regular members.
Women have more flexibility in their hips so they can do that with their legs. see: post #1901046
Windsofgold said:
Women have more flexibility in their hips so they can do that with their legs. see: post #1901046
I mean they literally make no sense. Her legs' positioning would either imply she has a ridiculously long abdomen section, or her legs have a very weird shape, especially judging by how the skirt billows on our left. Another drawing of her by the same author in post #6870198 is also weird anatomy, again with the legs. Her knees are same level as Yuuko's despite being much taller, so again either super long tummy or weird legs.
Updated
Alabel said:
I mean they literally make no sense. Her legs' positioning would either imply she has a ridiculously long abdomen section, or her legs have a very weird shape, especially judging by how the skirt billows on our left. Another drawing of her by the same author in post #6870198 is also weird anatomy, again with the legs. Her knees are same level as Yuuko's despite being much taller, so again either super long tummy or weird legs.
Ok, I see that.
Have a few that are recent and a couple that I had tried to get feedback on but never got a reply. Some of the characters are a bit obscure, so perhaps familiarity is a contributing factor?
Recent:
post #7294299
post #7255912
post #7250689
post #7178854
A pair of older ones:
post #6897861
post #6836002
Much appreciated in advance
whats with this post getting deleted now post #7318510 wtf is wrong with this post
argentb said:
Have a few that are recent and a couple that I had tried to get feedback on but never got a reply. Some of the characters are a bit obscure, so perhaps familiarity is a contributing factor?
Much appreciated in advance
Were I to make a guess, post #7294299 aside from not enough interest is western cartoon style, second got approved, post #7250689 not enough interest (and maybe suspicion of AI influence?), post #7178854 substandard quality, low interest in post #6897861 and post #6836002? If it's not an issue of borderline content or poor quality, it's usually that none of approvers felt it's good enough. Could be wrong.
Alabel said:
post #7250689 not enough interest (and maybe suspicion of AI influence?)
It was drawn before the beta of the popular models.
May I get feedback on these?
The first one is quite cute and well done in my opinion, honestly imo it seems quite approvable.
The second one I understood from the beginning why it could perhaps not be approved, but I uploaded it specifically because a censored version was uploaded and approved just before mine (post #7318197) so I just contributed an uncensored version of an already approved post.
Thanks.
Pfaradissa said:
May I get feedback on these?
First one could be either not enough interest from approvers mixed with some oddities, like the way her left breast is implied to be smaller than the right? As for the second, it's possible the biggest reason is bad type of image link.
MF144 said:
The anatomy is clearly bad on this one
MF144 said:
post #7145112
Also bad anatomy. The beck and shoulders on left character.
Pfaradissa said:
I uploaded it specifically because a censored version was uploaded and approved just before mine (post #7318197) so I just contributed an uncensored version of an already approved post.
It wasn't, it bypassed the modqueue. What's that source? Is it an edit or a paid reward?
Good day!
May I ask for some feedback on why these got deleted? And I would like to ask if there is anything that I must improve?
