The bulk update request #24213 (forum #272447) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #24213 (forum #272447) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #24241 (forum #272526) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #24493 (forum #273565) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #25172 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication strikers_peach -> princess_peach
One more!
I reorganized the links on Princess Peach wiki according to current status. ( https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_page_versions/565251 )
Before I continue:
Is it correct?
Is it useful?
Is labeling official vs official but nameless vs fan useful?
I think so considering Winter Peach ≠ Princess Peach (Wintertime).
cythieus said:
Baby Peach is actually just a young version of her, I guess covered under "aged down"
Apparently they come from time travel.
The whole baby lot is official.
IMO that justifies their tags, but they should imply their normal form, and aged down.
Wrong cases seem very unlikely for this.
Note: Some post featuring both are tagged dual persona, some not.
one of the things that I don't see people discuss that they kind of do in the games is that Paper Mario and Paper Peach and the other paper characters are separate people from the normal variants of Mario and Peach
They seem a separate drawing style, not design. Paper Peach matches the description of normal Peach etc.
Even some distinct designs like older SMB don't have a separate tag.
So people can just search princess_peach paper_mario, right?
Ah, looking at this result, Paper Mario seems more often given by context than style.
The bulk update request #24067 (forum #271890) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #25172 (forum #276555) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #24497 (forum #273579) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #24692 (forum #274328) has been approved by @nonamethanks.