BUR #8602 has been rejected.
mass update sex_toy rating:safe -> sex_toy rating:questionable
Sex toys not being used, or hinted at or hidden under clothes.
Posted under Tags
BUR #8602 has been rejected.
mass update sex_toy rating:safe -> sex_toy rating:questionable
Sex toys not being used, or hinted at or hidden under clothes.
Do you consider post #989560 or post #2389051 nsfw?
ppp_laivu_stato said:
Yes, for they introduce implications. Not explicit. Disregard me though.
We don't tag for possible implications. Just because something sexual is implied or could happen in a next moment, doesn't mean the image is "questionable" in a Danbooru sense. We have rules, but taggers should still have enough common sense to know what is a "safe" and what is a sexual image.
The bulk update request #8602 (forum #204078) has been rejected by @ppp_laivu_stato.