Danbooru

two-tone and multicolored implications

Posted under Tags

iphn

BUR #7567 has been rejected.

Show

create implication two-tone_dress -> multicolored_dress
create implication two-tone_shirt -> multicolored_shirt
create implication two-tone_skirt -> multicolored_skirt
create implication two-tone_ribbon -> multicolored_ribbon
create implication two-tone_bikini -> multicolored_bikini
create implication two-tone_hairband -> multicolored_hairband
create implication two-tone_gloves -> multicolored_gloves
create implication two-tone_legwear -> multicolored_legwear
create implication two-tone_headwear -> multicolored_headwear
create implication two-tone_swimsuit -> multicolored_swimsuit
create implication two-tone_leotard -> multicolored_leotard
create implication two-tone_cape -> multicolored_cape
create implication two-tone_footwear -> multicolored_footwear
create implication two-tone_coat -> multicolored_coat
create implication two-tone_bow -> multicolored_bow
create implication two-tone_hoodie -> multicolored_hoodie
create implication two-tone_shorts -> multicolored_shorts
create implication two-tone_panties -> multicolored_panties
create implication two-tone_neckwear -> multicolored_neckwear
create implication two-tone_bra -> multicolored_bra
create implication two-tone_sweater -> multicolored_sweater
create implication two-tone_kimono -> multicolored_kimono
create implication two-tone_pants -> multicolored_pants
create implication two-tone_bodysuit -> multicolored_bodysuit
create implication two-tone_vest -> multicolored_vest
create implication multicolored_shirt -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_shirt -> shirt
create implication multicolored_hairband -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_hairband -> hairband
create implication multicolored_leotard -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_leotard -> leotard
create implication multicolored_footwear -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_coat -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_coat -> coat
create implication multicolored_neckwear -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_sweater -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_sweater -> sweater
create implication multicolored_pants -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_pants -> pants
create implication multicolored_vest -> multicolored_clothes
create implication multicolored_vest -> vest

two-tone_* should imply multicolored_* and multicolored_* should imply multicolored_clothes.

Reply
Nacha Jerr skylightcrystal Nameless Contributor iridescent slime NNescio Shinjidude
skylightcrystal

Definite -1 to multicolored_ribbon and multicolored_bow implicating multicolored_clothes. These things are often not anything to do with clothing (eg. post #3031727).

Not really fond of the multicolored_hairband implication to multicolored_clothes either... Are hairbands really considered clothes?

Also the two-tone to multicolored implications would kill off the whole "non-null colour" thing that multicolored is currently defined with. Is that what we want to do? Looking at two-tone dress as an example it seems MOST of them have one or more of the two "tones" being a null colour.

+1 to all the multicolored_x -> x ones, and the rest of the multicolored_x -> multicolored_clothes ones, though.

Updated

Reply
iphn

Definite -1 to multicolored_ribbon and multicolored_bow implicating multicolored_clothes. These things are often not anything to do with clothing (eg. post #3031727).

I didn't think of that and removed the multicolored_ribbon and multicolored_bow to multicolored_clothes implication.

Also the two-tone to multicolored implications would kill off the whole "non-null colour" thing that multicolored is currently defined with. Is that what we want to do? Looking at two-tone dress as an example it seems MOST of them have one or more of the two "tones" being a null colour.

This seems to be the case for two-tone_jaket as well and it already implies multicolored_jacket.
Should null colors be allowed for two-tone but not for multicolored?

Reply
1