imply cellphone_charm -> charm_(object)

BUR #7260 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication cellphone_charm -> charm_(object)
create alias phone_charm -> cellphone_charm

As far as I can tell, a bag charm, a cellphone charm, and a keychain are all different types of charm (object)), with the only difference being what they're attached to (if you put it on a bag, it's a bag charm, etc.). bag charm already implicates charm (object), but I'm putting in for the other two as well.

Does post #4704833 count as a keychain? Because in that case that's a keychan that's not a charm.

Yeah the keychain implication is problematic unless we want to redefine it to "don't use for actual keys". And that will likely still be mistagged anyway because people also call those keychains.

nonamethanks said:

Does post #4704833 count as a keychain? Because in that case that's a keychan that's not a charm.

Isn't that a key ring?

e: Yeah, looks like we have a keyring tag for that kind of thing. I'll go through and sort out the two tags.

ee: Okay, I've edited the BUR to affect only cellphone charm for now, because clearly the keychain/keyring/charm (object) overlap is going to be a separate issue. I'll make that its own post.

The bulk update request #7260 (forum #196952) has been approved by @nonamethanks.