[APPROVED] Tag implication: sitting_on_table -> sitting

create implication sitting_on_table -> sitting

Link to implication

This should be self-explanatory. Implementing this would make this tag's use more consistent.

EDIT: The tag implication sitting_on_table -> sitting has been approved by @Type-kun.

It should also implicate on table, the same way that sitting on desk implicates on desk.

On the other hand, under desk is aliased to under table, so for consistency should sitting on desk be aliased to sitting on table?

Probably should merge these sitting on tags, particularly given there really isn't a difference between a character sitting on a desk, table, or counter (post #1122423 or post #2677718). Having to have an individual tag for each of these similar flat top objects would be going overboard, and there's already intermixing of images of counters or desks being put under the sitting_on_table tag.

@NWF_Renim If we decide to go with the tag merging route, should we keep the sitting-specific sitting on table tag, or should everything be migrated to the more inclusive on table, adding sitting wherever necessary?

I agree with iridescent slime.
This looks like a tag that can be purged with a simple two tag search.

^except that would also bring up things like post #2292918 and post #2286526. These do make up less than 1 in 10 of the sitting on_table results at present, though.

The tag implication sitting_on_table -> sitting has been approved by @Type-kun.