[REJECTED] Lace trims

create implication lace-trimmed_sleeves -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_collar -> lace_trim
remove implication lace-trimmed_thighhighs -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_shirt -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_swimsuit -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_kimono -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_bikini -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_panties -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_gloves -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_ribbon -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_dress -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_skirt -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_bra -> lace
remove implication lace-trimmed_thighhighs -> thighhighs
create implication lace-trimmed_shirt -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_swimsuit -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_kimono -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_panties -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_gloves -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_ribbon -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_dress -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_skirt -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_bra -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_bikini -> lace_trim
create implication lace-trimmed_legwear -> lace_trim
create alias lace-trimmed_thighhighs -> lace-trimmed_legwear
create alias lace-trimmed_kneehighs -> lace-trimmed_legwear

Link to request

Following on from topic #14098. Implying lace-trimmed_bikini to lace-trimmed_swimsuit instead of directly to lace_trim as bikini implies swimsuit already.

There's also a lace-trimmed legwear tag, of which quite a few are lace-trimmed_thighhighs. Does anything want to happen to this?

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1196 (forum #131992) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

mass update lace lace_trim -favgroup:1996 -> lace_trim

Link to request

DO NOT APPROVE THIS ONE UNTIL AFTER THE ONE ABOVE. Otherwise it defies the whole point of doing it.

Bulk update to remove the mass of stuff under the lace tag that wants to be lace_trim.

favgroup 1996 consists of the images that are currently tagged with both lace and lace_trim, with some things where the lace is just lace trim removed manually. This is to keep both tags on anything that currently has both tags and wants to stay that way.

Of course, there may be some things that want the lace tag adding back again but better to have a few dozen of those than thousands of things left in the lace tag that don't want to be.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1197 (forum #131993) has been rejected by @kuuderes_shadow.

There's also a lace-trimmed legwear tag, of which quite a few are lace-trimmed_thighhighs. Does anything want to happen to this?

I say lace-trimmed thighhighs should be aliased to lace-trimmed legwear. We already do this for frilled thighhighs -> frilled legwear.

+1 to everything else.

+1 to lace-trimmed thighhighs -> lace-trimmed legwear.

-1 to lace-trimmed bikini -> lace-trimmed swimsuit.

It was decided back in topic #12526 and topic #12432 that only the bikini -> swimsuit implication should exist. Everything else should be kept separate. Otherwise *_bikini would pollute the *_swimsuit tags.

Edit:

Also not sure how well the first BUR will work. It's indeterminate what order the lines will be executed, and so if the remove implication lines don't get executed first, then the create implication lines will fail.

I could make it into 3 BURs (removal, then addition, then getting rid of the spare lace tags) if there's going to be a problem?

I changed the first BUR so that lace-trimmed bikini implies lace trim like the others rather than lace-trimmed swimsuit.

Added an implication request from lace-trimmed legwear to lace trim and an alias request from both lace-trimmed thighhighs and lace-trimmed kneehighs. Also created a request to remove the implication from lace-trimmed thighhighs to thighhighs as otherwise this would mess things up.

kuuderes_shadow said:

I could make it into 3 BURs (removal, then addition, then getting rid of the spare lace tags) if there's going to be a problem?

Actually, after reviewing what Type-kun said previously, I don't think there will be a problem. There is only an issue when you're trying to remove and create an alias using the same tags with the same BUR. Since you're just creating aliases, there shouldn't be any issue.

+1 to the requests now as they stand.

The bulk update request #1197 (forum #131993) has been rejected by @kuuderes_shadow.

Rejected the second part to free up the favgroup for other purposes. If the first part is approved it shouldn't be too hard to do the second part manually.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1196 (forum #131992) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.