Posted under Tags
create implication indian_style -> crossed_legs
If the style of sitting requires legs to be crossed, why would this not apply?
Oh, I guess crossed_ankles works better. I am a fool.
The tag implication indian_style -> crossed_legs has been rejected.
Updated by DanbooruBot
This really depends on whether we count crossed ankles as a subset of crossed legs. I don't, but I'm probably in the minority considering that indian_style crossed_legs is almost entirely characters sitting with legs crossed at the ankles.
iridescent_slime said:
This really depends on whether we count crossed ankles as a subset of crossed legs. I don't, but I'm probably in the minority considering that indian_style crossed_legs is almost entirely characters sitting with legs crossed at the ankles.
Well, some post under that search don't even have crossed ankles. post #2510734 for example. Is the question if that even falls under indian_style then.
So I'm more with your stance to be honest.
