I would agree with an implication, but not an alias, no.
Before we even get an implication going, the tags need some cleaning up; the clitoris tags are divided between "clit" and "clitoris" right now.
Posted under General
I would agree with an implication, but not an alias, no.
Before we even get an implication going, the tags need some cleaning up; the clitoris tags are divided between "clit" and "clitoris" right now.
Also requesting a clitoris_piercing -> piercing implication.
Actually, scratch what I said earlier. There are cases where the ring slips onto the clitoris, similar to a ring on a finger, so an implication wouldn't be completely accurate.
There are two images on Danbooru that I know of where this is the case: post #331719 and post #583954.
Granted, the former's deleted and the latter probably will be too, but the exceptions exist. Would it be enough to undo the clitoris_ring -> clitoris_piercing implication?
Hillside_Moose said: Granted, the former's deleted and the latter probably will be too, but the exceptions exist. Would it be enough to undo the clitoris_ring -> clitoris_piercing implication?
I shrug. Guess so. Not high traffic tags anyway. Removed.