Accidental image downvotes [Was: Oops.]

I accidentally down-voted post #527143. I assume there's no way to revert that, correct? Or can a mod/admin change it?

[jxh edit: clarified subject line]

I up-voted it for you.

Problem fixed.

Actually, all you did was restore it to the status quo. You'd still need one more vote to get the result gladwort intended.

Hillside_Moose said:
Actually, all you did was restore it to the status quo. You'd still need one more vote to get the result gladwort intended.

You're right. Well, you can up-vote it for him then.

Huh, you used to be able to undo your own votes.

*tests*

And you can't anymore. How odd.

Fred1515 said:
I up-voted it for you.

Problem fixed.

Status quo is just fine--thanks. I didn't intend to upvote it--I just hit it accidentally with the mass vote tool.

I absentmindedly added a loli tag to an etna image that wasn't really loli... unless you count all etna pics as loli. I ask that a mod judge that for themselves when looking it over for approval.

Catloaf said: I absentmindedly added a loli tag to an etna image that wasn't really loli... unless you count all etna pics as loli. I ask that a mod judge that for themselves when looking it over for approval.

I don't look over every tag with a fine tooth comb when in the queue, so I might not notice the loli tag when checking. Can you link it in the thread so we can correct if needed?

jxh2154 said:
I don't look over every tag with a fine tooth comb when in the queue, so I might not notice the loli tag when checking. Can you link it in the thread so we can correct if needed?

He was probably talking about post #528866.

Fred1515 said:
He was probably talking about post #528866.

Hrm, yeah, that's all sorts of borderline. But I wouldn't tag it loli myself. Removed for now.

She's tiny framed and it's nudity I would say it qualifies but idk :I

Fun Fact from the game, Etna is over 1500 years old but the way that translates age in the game makes her relatively 15 so how does that apply to the loli tag

Loli Tag Wiki:
This tag implies sexually explicit or suggestive (not safe for work) art works of girls who are or appear to be preadolescent. Please note it doesn't matter whether the character is canonically of age -- if they look like kids, they are loli for the purpose of tagging.

So the way that the tag works is a matter of the opinion of who is tagging it. This could be a good example of an image that this would apply to

Fred1515 said:
He was probably talking about post #528866.

But in the end it is up to the mods and other high ranking danbooru users to figure it out. In my opinion this pic deserves the loli tag but I will leave it up to you mods.

95% of the time, naked Etna is loli by our standards. I added the tag back.

Fencedude said:
95% of the time, naked Etna is loli by our standards. I added the tag back.

and that is one of the main reasons i got a priv account, so i can browse unrestricted. thanks for clarification though Fencedude.

Fencedude said:
95% of the time, naked Etna is loli by our standards. I added the tag back.

But that pic isn't. Removed the tag back.

gladwort said:
I accidentally down-voted post #527143. I assume there's no way to revert that, correct? Or can a mod/admin change it?

OOPS. Did it again with post #639140. I thought the mass edit tool was reset, but went to the next page and it was pink background again. I hit this pic before I realized my mistake.
Not that it's that great (or terrible), but can someone fix or upvote it?

Once again, problem fixed.

Btw why did you have the mass edit tool set to vote down? You aren't the guy Scalar mentioned in forum #37850 by any chance, are you?

Fencedude said:
Huh, you used to be able to undo your own votes.

*tests*

And you can't anymore. How odd.

That has never worked as far as I know.

On a related note, is there any particular reason we have a vote lock-in? I don't think I see any substantial reason to not allow us to take our votes back - or to change our vote if we made a boo-boo.

Same goes for comment voting.

Initially the reason was that exactly who voted for what wasn't being tracked anywhere, which was the reason voting was able to be abused before the voting system was revamped and shut off for regular members.

Now that we do maintain that information (and I think Hazuki had requested it specifically in forum #37101), it might not be a bad idea to work it into the interface such that people can see their previous votes and undo/reverse them.

Display may create a bunch of new queries that weren't being made previously though, I'm not sure how that would impact the DB performance-wise. I wouldn't think it should be worse than determining favorite status (which is required to decide weather to display "add to" or "remove from" on the favorites link).