Danbooru

Should petticoat really imply lingerie?

Posted under General

I don't have a problem with this, although I made the original implication, since it does clearly cause an absurd result.

In my defense, I will note that the petticoat is absolutely an article of lingerie, which is simply a term meaning "women's undergarments"; it's just that today's lolis seem not to have the sense to realize that their underwear is showing.

I place the blame squarely on Minnie Mouse.

I do have to ask -- where, then, does this put nightgown, when you look at post #418269?

sgcdonmai said:
I was under the impression that petticoats are worn between the underclothes and the main garments.

I believe that a long time ago the petticoat was the main female undergarment worn below the waist. The panties/knickers were introduced later, which has left the petticoat with a slightly ambiguous status.

1