๐ŸŽ‰ Happy 19th Birthday to Danbooru! ๐ŸŽ‰
Danbooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

That is a Nuke gunner shrimp. RU...

โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โข€โฃ€โฃ€โฃ€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €
โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃ โกดโขพโ …โ €โ €โ €โ ‰โ โ ‰โ ‰โ ฐโกคโข€โ €โ €โ €
โ €โข€โ –โ šโ ‰โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ‘โกทโก€โ €
โ €โขžโข†โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โฃ€โ €โก€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โขงโ €
โ €โ €โ ซโข„โฃ โฃคโฃ„โฃคโฃฟโ ›โ Ÿโ ปโขปโฃฟโฃ†โ €โข€โฃ โฃคโ žโ €
โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ˆโ ‰โ ‰โ ›โขปโ €โ €โ €โขธโ ฟโ ›โ ›โ ‹โ ‰โ โ €โ €
โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โข€โฃ€โ ฝโก€โก€โฃฐโ ธโขคโฃ€โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €
โ €โ €โ €โ €โขฐโกŠโ €โ €โก€โข€โกโฃ€โฃ€โ €โ €โฃผโ †โ €โ €โ €โ €
โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €โ ‰โ ™โ ›โขปโขนโ ‹โก‹โฃฟโ ›โ ‰โ โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €
โ €โ €โ €โ €โก€โ คโ €โฃฐโฃžโ ธโ €โ ‡โขธโ –โกโ „โ €โ €โ €โ €โ €
โ €โฃ€โฃดโฃพโฃฟโฃฟโฃพโฃ โฃโ €โกคโฃ โกˆโขงโฃโฃทโฃถโฃ„โก€โ €โ €
โ ˆโ €โ โ ˆโ ™โ นโ ฟโ ฟโ ทโ ปโกฟโฃฟโ ฟโ ฟโ ฟโ ปโ ปโ ฏโ ปโ –โก†

  • -1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    This is me almost every night. Well, in my case, I'm the guy (obviously) and, the pillows are under me. Not quite the same as being on top of a sexy pritty kitty with Chun-Li-like legs but, hey.

    I takes. What I gets. Where I can gets it.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • Show 2 more comments
    [hidden]

    CGrascal said:

    Except the evidence for their reasoning was a thing from back on the Gamecube. The English localization tried to sweep it under the rug.

    "A thing from back on the Gamecube"? Is Vivian trans in the JP version of the remake, too, not just the EN one?

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    BigHeroCV6 said:

    "A thing from back on the Gamecube"? Is Vivian trans in the JP version of the remake, too, not just the EN one?

    Yep.

    ใใ‚Œใซใ€€ใ˜ใคใฏใ€€ใ‚ขใ‚ฟใ‚คใ€‚ใ€‚ใ€‚
    ไฝ“ใฏใ€€ใ‚ชใƒˆใ‚ณใฎใ‚ณใ ใ‘ใฉ
    ใ‚ณใ‚ณใƒญใฏใ€€ใ‚ซใƒฏใ‚คใ‚คใ€€ใ‚ชใƒณใƒŠใฎใ‚ณใชใฎ

    The truth is...
    My body is that of a boy
    But my heart is a cute girl's!

  • 4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Shrimp are surprisingly brutal punchers. Whether mantis shrimp through power smashing or impaling attack, or pistol shrimp whose snapping produces bubbles through cavitation strong enough kill small fish and stun larger ones.

  • 5
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    y'know, as an asian, we just harvest these things by metric tons, plain steam it, peel its back shell off and optionally dip it in some vinegar and garlic. it is very tasty. it was not until i saw some nature documentary that i learned about their punches. nothing beats us asians i guess, unless im in a ring and my opponent is wearing a mantis shrimp in her chef hat

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Tsumikiss said:

    y'know, as an asian, we just harvest these things by metric tons, plain steam it, peel its back shell off and optionally dip it in some vinegar and garlic. it is very tasty. it was not until i saw some nature documentary that i learned about their punches. nothing beats us asians i guess, unless im in a ring and my opponent is wearing a mantis shrimp in her chef hat

    It's far from the only brutal predator of the animal kingdom that humans casually eat

  • 0
  • Reply
  • Show 11 more comments
    [hidden]

    it doesn't take much to ship a het but when it comes to gay ships, it needs a peer review to be, at best, be friends. Even if the said gay pairing intimately danced, but if that was het its undisputed. They have the gall to act like the minority or the victims lmao.

    when you call them out to their subtle homophobia, its "twitter rage" and they'll use any form of resistance that comes their way to justify said homophobia.

    these people hate shipping only if its gay; if het, its "they can ship whatever they want" ยฏ\_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

  • -2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    looks at comments

    Well, this is quite the mess.

    To Zei12, platonic ships are a thing too, you know. If you don't like them being shipped as a couple, then just see this pic as them being good friends.

    To saiso, out of the twenty posts you've commented on, you've been vocal about hetero Acheron on seventeen or eighteen of them. On the RatUrine pic, you pretty much said that it should have been Acheron instead of Dr. Ratio.

    Crap like this is why I don't talk about ships much even though I do some shipping myself.

  • 5
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    OniTenshi500 said:

    looks at comments

    Well, this is quite the mess.

    To Zei12, platonic ships are a thing too, you know. If you don't like them being shipped as a couple, then just see this pic as them being good friends.

    To saiso, out of the twenty posts you've commented on, you've been vocal about hetero Acheron on seventeen or eighteen of them. On the RatUrine pic, you pretty much said that it should have been Acheron instead of Dr. Ratio.

    Crap like this is why I don't talk about ships much even though I do some shipping myself.

    In defense of the RatUrine one, I commented that because it was mistagged as Acheron instead of Aventurine before I learned I can actually edit it myself to fix it

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    I say fans are free to ship whoever they wat with whoever they want.
    We should be free to ship, to fanfic, to fanart and even self-insert.

    And people who don't like it are free to ignore it, as fanarts do not harm the canon.

    I get tired of people who get offended by fanart as if it hurts their personal beliefs with a directed attack.

  • 3
  • Reply
  • Show 6 more comments
    [hidden]

    flamestrike said:

    W-wow!!! At this point, why the heck aren't they just adding sex into the game. There's no subtext here, only blazing hot sexual text. She's literally about to orgasm thinking of the Commander, then inviting them to fck her in the pool. Is this the most forward Azure Lane scene in the game, or am I missing something?

    Alsace may have been coy (if not entirely truthful) about not stopping the Commander, but go look at Shinano's scene in "Port Fashion Collection! Part 2". She outright suggests they let passion take the wheel and invites them in a way that could only be more explicit is if she actually used the words "Let's have sex."

  • 13
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Delnoir said:

    Alsace may have been coy (if not entirely truthful) about not stopping the Commander, but go look at Shinano's scene in "Port Fashion Collection! Part 2". She outright suggests they let passion take the wheel and invites them in a way that could only be more explicit is if she actually used the words "Let's have sex."

    "them"? i thought it was between skk and Shinano

  • -3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Artists like Rinhee are going to have a blast with these new girls and stuff like St. Louis' new skin. People here already know what's going on too.

    Thank God I'm too broke to buy these skins. Alsace is built to drain every part of someone dry with that energy, Mogador too with that sweet obsessive touch.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    flamestrike said:

    W-wow!!! At this point, why the heck aren't they just adding sex into the game. There's no subtext here, only blazing hot sexual text. She's literally about to orgasm thinking of the Commander, then inviting them to fck her in the pool. Is this the most forward Azure Lane scene in the game, or am I missing something?

    And yet, Alsace isn't even the thirstiest shipgirl they added in this update. Just check out Mogador.

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    This girl makes Taihou look normal.

    Delnoir said:

    Alsace may have been coy (if not entirely truthful) about not stopping the Commander, but go look at Shinano's scene in "Port Fashion Collection! Part 2". She outright suggests they let passion take the wheel and invites them in a way that could only be more explicit is if she actually used the words "Let's have sex."

    I went and looked on the Azur Lane wiki and holy shit, you're not kidding. I don't know how I missed that since I HAVE that cutscene in my archives...

  • 0
  • Reply
  • Show 10 more comments
    [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    I will never understand some people's irrational hatred of small hats. I remember Matsukaze's Kantai wiki page being a dumpster fire for this reason.

    Haters will hate.
    And pretty much everything has its hater.
    "pretty much" because we can't be sure of non-existence.

  • -1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Demundo said:
    They are there for decoration, not practical uses.

    And I already said that I think they look bad. And I think I'm right about that, because I sure don't see a lot of people wearing such tiny hats, neither for daily use or special occasions.
    Of course nobody wears them, they look silly.

    blindVigil said:
    I will never understand some people's irrational hatred of small hats.

    I never said I HATE tiny hats, I just dislike them. Don't put words in my mouth.
    How can an opinion about aesthetics be "irrational"?
    And how is this overreaction against me simply disliking the small hats not a lot more irrational? What's so wrong with disliking tiny hats?

    BrokenEagle98 said:

    For someone that browses an anime site full of Japanese culture, they sure as heck don't understand Japanese culture

    You don't have to like everything about Japan.

    Updated

  • -11
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Man, just take the L and go away already. Nobody was responding because everyone is tired of you. In case it's not clear to you, you're getting downvoted because of the negativity and bad manners. It's generally considered bad form to bad mouth other people or cultures.

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    AlsoSprachOdin said:

    And I already said that I think they look bad. And I think I'm right about that, because I sure don't see a lot of people wearing such tiny hats, neither for daily use or special occasions.
    Of course nobody wears them, they look silly.

    You are right that these mini hat and mini caps are not worn daily.
    But people do wear them as a decorative piece of clothing in certain kind of fashions.
    A common usage is when they are used in performances, like in Takarazuka.

    Other examples are in Lolita fashions.
    If you think they are silly being tiny as they are, you haven't seen them being decorated with all sort of stuff.
    And it's not limited to just Japanese Lolita Fashion either.
    Though, I have to say, mini hats are conisdered hard to coordinate, but there are certain formulars to make them work like balancing them with hair style, or with other accessories...

    If you think those are just weird fashions, how about Marie Antoinette Fashion?
    (the picture is actually from a film recreating it, not the actual person, because, duh)
    The actual person is depicted with mini hat over a large head of hair (wig) though.
    Needless to say, she still defined fashion quite a bit, even to this day.

    Point is, your opinion is not the only opinion and thus even if it's right to you, it's not objectively correct because there are actual people thinking the other way.
    Opinion about aesthetics being "irrational" is something keep happening again and again through time, and Marie Antoinette is the embodiment of said "irrationality" in her time, but she did make a lot of change to perception to aesthetics and beauty. So you not being fond of mini hats is normal, but other people being fond of it should not be "irrational" either. It might be a whole culture/sub-culture you did not know or understand there.

    Lastly, you seems to be dismissal of mini hats, but you did not even prove how right you are and only claim to be right.
    That's not how you do arguments. Just saying.
    That's the thing made me write this over an hour finding the relevant example and mincing my words so they are not affected by the annoyance I got from your comments.

    At least try to be a proper person man. That should get you more sympathizers than not.

  • 4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    BrokenEagle98 said:
    Man, just take the L and go away already.

    ... Mmmno, I don't feel like it. Might be the way you talk to me inspires spite.

    BrokenEagle98 said:
    Nobody was responding because everyone is tired of you.

    Really didn't take much, especially considering how much you seem to care.

    BrokenEagle98 said:
    It's generally considered bad form to bad mouth other people or cultures.

    Are you serious? If I say the giant, furry hats the English royal guards wear look silly, now I'm suddenly badmouthing the entire English culture? Can we not be a little more nuanced than that?
    And people? When did I say someone is a bad person for liking stupid-looking hats? Again, nuance. It is in fact YOU guys who are saying that I'm a bad person for disliking some hats.
    FFS, people. I'm "bad-mouthing" some hats, it's really should not be such a big deal.

    Demundo said:
    Point is, your opinion is not the only opinion and thus even if it's right to you, it's not objectively correct because there are actual people thinking the other way.

    Why do you think this needs to be explained? If someone says they don't like chili hotdogs, do you start telling them off for having an opinion that's contrary to all the chili hotdog enjoyers? Of course I know my opinion isn't objective metaphysical truth, but sometimes I just want to express my opinions without prefacing them with disclaimers like "in my opinion", "in general but not in all outlying cases", or "I know the universe is an absurd, random dance of dust and objective truth is impossible, but I FEEL like..." because honestly this should all go without saying, at least after we've all heard and said it the first hundred times.

    Opinion about aesthetics being "irrational" is something keep happening again and again through time

    Yes yes yes, everything is subjective. But someone claiming to enjoy eating broken glass doesn't mean broken glass is proper food - we can surely agree on this if we just put our figurative feet on the ground and our heads out of the philosophical clouds. And if you have a hat whose form does not fit any purpose but decoration, and is almost exclusively worn by niche fashion enthusiasts or those who're several centuries in the past, a hat which if worn by the average child would see them mercilessly mocked and bullied, then it's probably because most people find that they look silly. I'm not saying that popular opinion defines truth, but if most people can agree - as I think they do out of the internet - that tiny hats look silly, then I think it's reasonable to say, in a not-so-strictly philosophical manner, but for all practical intents, that they look silly.

    Lastly, you seems to be dismissal of mini hats, but you did not even prove how right you are and only claim to be right.

    Well yeah, as we've agreed, this is not something that can be proven as such. I won't claim to have ever proven my case, only argued for it, just like you've not proven that these hats don't look silly, you've simply argued your case. And arguing is absolutely how you "do arguments", lots of things can be argued for and against forever without anything ever being proven. Like philosophy.

    At least try to be a proper person man.

    Aaaaand here we are again. How in the actual fuck does me saying I think tiny hats look silly make me an "improper person"? I think it says much more about you that you would make such drastic judgements about someone for saying something so innocuous.

    It's just a silly hat, people. I'd prefer it wasn't in the picture, but I'd even more prefer that you guys get some perspective.

  • -4
  • Reply
  • 1 2 3 4 5