Took me a minute to realize this was a combination of the two source images. I guess the fact that everything outside the center of the image is already blurred helps make the edit work. Having both watermarks looks a bit redundant, though.

Naretla said:

Took me a minute to realize this was a combination of the two source images. I guess the fact that everything outside the center of the image is already blurred helps make the edit work. Having both watermarks looks a bit redundant, though.

Having both watermarks is a better choice, I think. When you combine the two pictures, the watermark of more complete version is crippled. The other choices are leaving as is which may be an insult to the artist, and erasing it which hurts the picture.