Not rori :3.
Posted under General
Was originally tagged loli by the uploader. The body type seems a bit on the childish side, so I'm questioning the tag's removal.
iridescent_slime said:
Was originally tagged loli by the uploader. The body type seems a bit on the childish side, so I'm questioning the tag's removal.
Definitely loli, the tagger in question seemed to be more opposed to the idea that the character was a "girl".
post #20693
Is this really sexual enough to warrant a Q rating and a loli tag?
ion288 said:
post #20693
Is this really sexual enough to warrant a Q rating and a loli tag?
I'd say no.
Not sure if it's considered sexual enough for loli/questionable.
Unbreakable said:
Not sure if it's considered sexual enough for loli/questionable.
I say no.
Unbreakable said:
Not sure if it's considered sexual enough for loli/questionable.
Considering the dialogue, I think it definitely is loli/questionable.
Nothing more explicit than a pantyshot, but very petite body proportions.
post #2941787 and children