Loli/shota check thread.

post #2903392

Unbreakable said:

post #2903392

Loli.

post #2367160. Shes got breasts but that looks like the body of a child.

ion288 said:

post #2367160. Shes got breasts but that looks like the body of a child.

She still looks like she has pretty wide hips.
Torso is a bit short, so to be honest it's more bad anatomy than loli.

post #9058 looks safe
post #8668 same
post #9007 looks petite

Then we have post #8591 which is not taged loli even though it does have a side boob on a child.

Unsure about the second and fourth one. Someone else?

I'd say loli on the fourth one just to be on the safe side, the second I'm not sure if the blood is enough to put it in the sexual category.

post #2911704
Tagged it with loli for now, but still...

The hips are too wide and the vulva too puffy for me to say loli.

post #9166. Looks young but not loli young to me.

Edit: post #11045. Shota?

post #2912228 and post #2912244, just to be sure.

Type-kun said:

post #2912228 and post #2912244, just to be sure.

I'd say no but I like to hear other's opinions too.

Unbreakable said:

I'd say no but I like to hear other's opinions too.

Same.

ion288 said:

post #9166. Looks young but not loli young to me.

Edit: post #11045. Shota?

Both don't count.

Im almost regretting upgrading to gold as I find so many "is this really loli" posts now. post #8177 looks safe to me.

post #2914144

Unbreakable said:

post #2914144

I'd say yes.

post #2827871

With those hips and legs? I don't think so. I would just tag it as petite.

post #2915485
More loli, I'd say.