Looks post puberty to me.
Posted under General
Looks post puberty to me.
Missingno2024 said:
most definitely. tagged.
And this? (Dot is canonically 5 or something, but i think the anime version of her on the reboot is more)
post #4270152
Arcaeca said:
No.
Vanniaa067 said:
And this? (Dot is canonically 5 or something, but i think the anime version of her on the reboot is more)
post #4270152
You've been told before that canon age doesn't matter. That set is probably a yes, though.
Missingno2024 said:
Not with a body like that
nareehS said:
The artist tagged this particular artwork as loli, which I am not sure if that is the case.
Loli tag on pixiv doesn't necessarily mean it needs it on Danbooru, because their definitions are different.
(also next time do asset #23737040 - no exclamation point - so it doesn't embed the image).
(Also for this image pretty sure it would be no)
To clarify, I kind of messed up here. I'm sorry, I'm new to danbooru and made a decision that should have been discussed instead.
This post was NOT tagged as loli beforehand, but due to the petite body and the fact that the artist, loodncrood, has posted art that resembles loli content before (such as Anya from Spy X Family) I just assumed that this was maybe more considering of the tag. However, I realise now that maybe I should have allowed it to be left as it is, despite my best idea to say why I did it in the comments section of the post - comment #2465248 .
So, I guess I will leave this post here, to see if anyone feels it deserves to have the tag removed. Again, apologies for this, I don't intend to be malicious or power-hungry if that's what it comes across as.
japooter said:
I don’t see how this makes you power-hungry, but just so you know for the future, we don’t take the artist’s intent or past works into account when tagging loli or shota. If there isn’t enough evidence in the post itself, then it doesn’t qualify for the tag.
Also, you mentioned the post falling under teenage in your comment. That tag was deprecated a couple years ago, so while the tag still exists, it can’t be added to new posts. We generally do this to phase out obsolete tags without negatively affecting the posts’ searchability, which makes it easier to replace them with superior tags when appropriate.
For this post, I’m slightly leaning towards not loli, but just to be safe, I’ll leave the tag on until others have a chance to weigh in.
japooter said:
I've actually have seen the post in question before you added the tag, and I understand why this picture is visually speaking a bit of an edge case. But I agree with Blank User in that I'm leaning towards "not loli".
nareehS said:
The artist tagged this particular artwork as loli, which I am not sure if that is the case.
In danbooru wiki says that Loli it's just for explicit, questionable or sensitive posts, in my pov (point of view) it doesn't make sense put "loli" on a sfw/general post so it's right.