Posted under General
Wenli said:
Any feedback on these?
post #3161985 - Pose and perspective are very weird. It seems like the artist wanted to cram as much ass and tits as possible into the image and also show her face, neglecting to think about how all that might actually be connected.
post #3150066 - Looks pretty bland and not very interesting. I guess it didn’t appeal to anyone.
Wenli said:
Any feedback on these?
If it weren't for the hat making her head look super weirdly out of proportion this would have been an easy approve for me.
kittey said:
post #2745603 - The style looks pretty western and it’s not of an anime-styled copyright either. Many approvers don’t like WW art (western style, western copyright/OC). This is an anime-style image board after all.
It's an anime style. Perhaps "western"-influenced but most definitely anime-influenced. And to say that it's not of an anime IP and that originals don't count is just irrelevant, if it's of a western IP is the only context that W has relevance. You many notice, the artist of the picture in question has over a hundred active posts of the same style, many of which are original pieces.
g3gen said:
I do understand some moderators don't want to clog the board with lower quality dupes and won't approve a Twitter post if a Pixiv duplicate is uploaded.
But the Twitter posts are often uploaded in good faith only to have a another uploader spot and post the Pixiv version that came out a half hour later often using the keywords from the Twitter upload that others put work into for good tagging.
The Twitter poster's work is down the drain when deleted, and the upload quota is reduced as a penalty.
In that case there could be a policy that could waive the upload penalty where the Twitter post was uploaded before the Pixiv one provided the moderator pool did not want the twitter upload.
I really have little patience for this. Typically uploaders don't even check the artist wiki for other profiles which may have the image in better quality. If they upload a poorer one and then it get's parented by the better, well sorry. And also if an artist uploads a pic to Twitter and then Pixiv a day later, they typically have a pattern of this.
I will approve Twitter posts if the artist doesn't typically post right to Pixiv as a grace and discuss with a user some patterns that can help their ratio and things to look for. I've been hit with this before early on, I don't think it's an even minor concern.
No idea why this was not approved. Quality looks fine to me unless its the JPEG thing?
post #3163570 - was not approved however the work-in-progress version was post #3161108
I posted the entire Neptunia @ E3 collection:
post #3164638
post #3164642
post #3164645
post #3165261
post #3165262
post #3165264
post #3165265
post #3165268
post #3165269
and I still have the rest of the collection to upload, although post #2160881 was accepted.
I was going to compile them all in a single pool, and it's all by the same artist. What's wrong with it?
Thanks!
post #3162648 post #3162661 post #3162676 post #3162685
post #3166640
post #3161273 post #3160115
post #3167324 post #3167326 post #3167425
post #3153575 post #3153576
All of these have the same quality as other pieces I've or someone else uploaded by their respective artist which were accepted, but these weren't. Can I get an explanation please? :( Thanks.
DragonKnightGX said:
No idea why these weren't approved. Quality looks fine to me
The marker one looks fine, but not fantastic - probably just got looked over. I would have approved it.
post #3162743 the blonde's head connects to the neck oddly. The proportion of eye to head is a bit more unsettling than usual for anime-style. It's not particularly flawed, but there is nothing to make it stand out either.
Updated
I appealed this post #3170033 and it didn't get approved, so I guess it's just not a good fit.
I'm wondering what about it caused it to get deleted, especially compared to other images from the same artist.
I uploaded this Happy Sugar Life character post #3173408 and the deletion note said "It has been reviewed by 11 moderators. 11 did not like the post enough to approve it.".
I respect their decisions and would like learn what they didn't like for future reference. In this case was it the art itself or did they prefer the pic's Twitter upload over the Pixiv one?
https://twitter.com/sskpict_xxx/status/1001885159858171904
https://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=69002808
DragonKnightGX said:
Which one's the marker one?
post #3157276 looks like it was drawn markers, the other two are digital art.
post #3172181 Seems high-quality to me. I'm pretty confident on the translation, and it's of the same style and quality of all the artist's posts, and none of them are deleted. Is something else about it not popular?
I uploaded the first two images in the series as a way to gauge reception over a favourite artist's works, and since the first two were approved, I thought it would be okay to proceed with uploading entries on the series as they get uploaded on the artist's social media accounts. However, this one in particular was not approved, and now I've been wondering if there's something wrong with the image. I'm certain that the image's quality, being consistent with the others that have been approved already, passes Danbooru's standards, but there might be some things, some details that I've missed. Or maybe the fact that seven out of my nine measly uploads have been works of the same artist itself is problematic.
I would like to receive honest feedback on this post before I do anything else (or drop the matter completely).
Nasukee said:
No idea why this was not approved. Quality looks fine to me unless its the JPEG thing?
No feedback?
Basil27 said:
I uploaded the first two images in the series as a way to gauge reception over a favourite artist's works, and since the first two were approved, I thought it would be okay to proceed with uploading entries on the series as they get uploaded on the artist's social media accounts. However, this one in particular was not approved, and now I've been wondering if there's something wrong with the image. I'm certain that the image's quality, being consistent with the others that have been approved already, passes Danbooru's standards, but there might be some things, some details that I've missed. Or maybe the fact that seven out of my nine measly uploads have been works of the same artist itself is problematic.
I would like to receive honest feedback on this post before I do anything else (or drop the matter completely).
I think the group mods checking on that is different than the group on the previous uploads.
