Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Chiera said:

This post is also more western and those posts are put to higher scrutiny.
Poor quality probably because the breasts (especially the left one from our view) has some weird indents.

The copyright in question wasn't a problem for the influx of Wonder Woman artwork uploaded in June when the movie released. Copyright isn't related to why it was flagged.

And there's indents because her breasts are clearly being shot with bullets, which are bouncing off. You can't just gloss over the context of an image like that and then give your reason for "poor quality".

Apollyon said:

The copyright in question wasn't a problem for the influx of Wonder Woman artwork uploaded in June when the movie released. Copyright isn't related to why it was flagged.

And there's indents because her breasts are clearly being shot with bullets, which are bouncing off. You can't just gloss over the context of an image like that and then give your reason for "poor quality".

Well, poor quality is a bit short.

1. The copyright has not something to do with it being flagged. It has something to do with it not getting approved, because I can imagine quite well that approvers skipped it simply because of that and I wouldn't dismiss it completely. It's not against the rules, but you know how the queue works, als regarding copyrights.

2. It is a sketch, yes. But there is also weird coloring, like the red from the background on her forehead or other parts of this image. This gives this a rather rushed look.

3. I agree that she is being shot, but the breasts looks completely squeezed on that part where the bullet touches. It's bothering how there is an indent but the rest looks pretty untouched by it.

So... this one is from an artist who gets a lot of approvals on this site, but this artwork didn't?

post #2875314

The lower body doesn't seem to match up very well with the upper body to me.

tapnek said:

The lower body doesn't seem to match up very well with the upper body to me.

I don't see how that's the case. It looks fine to me.

Compare it with the official art:
post #2880893

There does seem to be a slight disconnect between the angle of the lower and the upper body. I'd upload an image of that quality, though, and approve it as well.

post #2853628
post #2877529

What was wrong with these images? Both are ultra high res official art and top one is a logoless version of an image the was approved already.

kars41 said:

post #2853628
post #2877529

What was wrong with these images? Both are ultra high res official art and top one is a logoless version of an image the was approved already.

I don't know about the first one, but the source seems rather...weird.

The second one is easier because 3d posts are high likely to get rejected and while this may be official, it isn't very striking to me and is rather boring to look at and we are focussing primarily on 2D art. It's a high risk for users with non unlimited ups to up such images.

post #2876848

I forgot to put it into Flower Knight Girl Official 4-koma pool and it ended up not getting approved.
Or is there any particular reason for this one not getting approved?

kars41 said:

post #2853628
post #2877529

What was wrong with these images? Both are ultra high res official art and top one is a logoless version of an image the was approved already.

If I was a Mod I would have approved the first one. Danbooru is flawed in that a Mod must like the image to approve it but I doubt we could have a system where every image is objectively judged from some pre set criteria. We would certainly have fewer people that wanted to be Mods.

The second picture is quite generic. There seems to be an idea that official art is good art. If anything official art is judged to an even higher standard than fan art.

post #2879177

kudus said:

post #2879177

The blond girls legs connects with her torso in a strange and unnatural looking way. Its a generic nude pic with lots of cum and lactation. This makes it less likely to get approved than other, safer art.

pool #12900

K.o.R said:

pool #12900

You have to link to the files like this: pool:Aikatsu!_-_Nyaikatsu!_(Koyama_Shigeru) status:any

nonamethanks said:

You have to link to the files like this: pool:Aikatsu!_-_Nyaikatsu!_(Koyama_Shigeru) status:any

Noted, thanks.

post #2880165

Kyusey said:

post #2880165

Aside from some kinda too-straight fingers, it looks fine to me. Perhaps it just didn't catch the fancy of the approval team.

post #2881435

kudus said:

post #2881435

How does her torso work? I cannot form a pose in which she is wearing combined with the camera angle to see her panties.

I'd appreciate feedback on these two: post #2880120 & post #2880123