Danbooru

Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

WeirdBlue said:

Hi, i'm new here and i don't really understand why all my posts have been deleted. Is the quality not sufficient for the site's criteria?
post #3353613
post #3204014
post #3203930

For starters you need to give a source where you got that pic from. The first one I might reconsider, but the two other's quality is pretty meh for me.

anearbyanimal said:

New to this site, confused what I did wrong.

post #3417145

We really discourage self-upload, unless it's good quality. Mainly to prevent quality bias.

PhoenixG said:

For starters you need to give a source where you got that pic from. The first one I might reconsider, but the two other's quality is pretty meh for me.

We really discourage self-upload, unless it's good quality. Mainly to prevent quality bias.

Well, i made this pics by myself :/

WeirdBlue said:

Well, i made this pics by myself :/

You should have read the Uploading Guidelines before uploading it/them.

Uploading One's Own Art is Sacrilege

Posting one's own art is severely frowned upon, and there are two reasons behind this:

  • Firstly, artists tend to be biased when it comes to judging the quality of their own work. What looks good to you may be regarded as mediocre to Danbooru moderators.
  • Secondly, allowing posting of own work (self-posting) will cause a sudden spike of sub-par uploads as users mistake us for another Pixiv or Deviantart, far beyond the scope and capacity of Danbooru.

More suitable sites to upload your own art to include Deviantart and Pixiv.

Admins and moderators are especially harsh on self-posting artists, lashing out penalties without remorse. The one and only way to feature your art on Danbooru is to show immense talent and skill elsewhere, and with that, captivate some fans on the other side of the Internet into uploading your art.

7wo said:

post #3421655
post #3422980
post #3422607
post #3422614
I just feedback some new delete again.

1. Fairly certain that's not how leaning to the side should look like. T-rex arms.
2. Weird looking crotch/hips and the asymmetrical docking looks weird even though breasts are rather squishy
3./4. Vastly inferior versions of the parent. Yes, there are very minor differents but imo they aren't enough to carry this image against the very small resolution compared to the parent.

Lacrimosa said:

1. Fairly certain that's not how leaning to the side should look like. T-rex arms.
2. Weird looking crotch/hips and the asymmetrical docking looks weird even though breasts are rather squishy
3./4. Vastly inferior versions of the parent. Yes, there are very minor differents but imo they aren't enough to carry this image against the very small resolution compared to the parent.

Well, it can see that approvers is subjective. Because I can easily find more posts of lower quality than these, and they have not been deleted, like these post #3422111 post #3023410 post #3016451 .

Updated

7wo said:

Well, it can see that approvers is subjective. Because I can easily find more posts of lower quality than these, and they have not been deleted.

If you see lower quality posts, flag them. Using the argument "But there are worse posts approved" is never gonna work.

7wo said:

Well, it can see that approvers is subjective. Because I can easily find more posts of lower quality than these, and they have not been deleted.

You asked for feedback for these posts and I gave it to you. Not sure what other posts have to do with that. But it's better to reflect on the feedback I gave you and try to improve.

Lacrimosa said:

You asked for feedback for these posts and I gave it to you. Not sure what other posts have to do with that. But it's better to reflect on the feedback I gave you and try to improve.

Ok, just talk about this post #3421655. Within three days, the "dislike" of 10 approvers could delete a 49-person favorite post. This work can be liked by most people, is it really of poor quality?