Tag Implication: milky_way -> starry_sky

Implicating milky_way -> starry_sky.

Reason: "My god, it's full of stars!"

You could have a personification of the milky way; that wouldn't necessarily involve a sky filled with stars.

A personification of the Milky Way is kind of out there, don't you think?

I'm more concern about an outer-space view of the Milky Way, which then would obviously be in space, not in a starry sky.

Hillside_Moose said:
I'm more concern about an outer-space view of the Milky Way, which then would obviously be in space, not in a starry sky.

For images like that I'd recommend using the galaxy tag instead, since it would be difficult to identify which galaxy was pictured (unless the image was annotated to that effect).

What if it was an image from say orbit? It could still have a band of stars that would follow the milky way definition, but it would not qualify as a "starry sky."

I'm against it, I can imagine an implication to galaxy and stars if its not done already.

Anelaid said:
I'm against it, I can imagine an implication to galaxy and stars if its not done already.

It would be star_(sky) not star.

Anelaid said:
I'm against it, I can imagine an implication to galaxy and star (sky) if its not done already.

I'm OK with this option as well.

Would we really use galaxy in every case, though? Especially when the view is from a point within said galaxy.

star_(sky) I'll do.