Implication for tentacle_hair -> prehensile_hair

Imply tentacle_hair -> prehensile_hair

Reason: I'm not sure if it really qualifies as prehensile hair but the wiki defines tentacle hair as a form of prehensile hair, so with that logic, they should be implicated.

forum #50556

rarrrrrgh

In this case, I'm referencing the wiki which refers to it at such and that thread seemed to not reach a stance for or against it, but it does create the precedent that tentacle hair is gray area at best for prehensile hair.

Bump an old thread if you want to restart a conversation not make a new one.

Not all tentacle hair is prehensile so an implication cannot exist, do not rely solely on wikis for implication requests, you must also use common sense.

As log says, it's not necessarily prehensile. So just add manually where appropriate.