Tag Suggestion: intertwined_tails

Examples:
post #897263
post #869853

I've already added the intertwined_tails tag to a couple of posts since I think it's a good concept/tag name, but I thought getting some input (or possible objections) would be prudent.

And if we get the go-ahead to officially use the tag, we'd want the following alias and implication:

Alias:
intertwined_tail -> intertwined_tails

Implicate:
intertwined_tails -> tail

Thanks.

I like the concept and I like the implication (may want to change to the implication to intertwined_tails -> tail) but the alias I'm not sure about. I don't have any examples at the moment against the alias though.

Yupsies, that was a typo. Fixed.

And as far as the alias, I think it's highly unlikely there are any posts that include a single tail wrapped around itself (though if such a post did exist, the alias would be trivial to undo).

For now, I think it's simpler to exclusively use the plural variant, as I'm confident the tag's usage will always involve more than one tail.

Even if a tail was wrapped around itself it wouldn't really be intertwined, it would have to be wrapped up with another object.

If we're doing this, then tail wrap should be an another implication.

Hmm, any input on post #588851?

At a glance, it doesn't quite look like it matches the definition of intertwined_tails (it's closer to tail_wrap), but I'm thinking it could still be tagged with it because it's a case of "close enough".

Bapabooiee said:
Hmm, any input on post #588851?

It definitely looks close enough to me. Can't we say the definition of intertwined_tails is "A tail wrapped around another tail"?

Would this also apply to solo multiple_tails characters? (post #461054)

S1eth said: post #461054

I'd say so. No reason for the tag to only be limited to at least two characters.