Tag alias: o-ring_bikini_top --> o-ring_top

i guess it would make sense to alias
o-ring_bikini_top to o-ring_top

and rename/alias ring bikini to o-ring_bikini

there may be a better way to solve this, but this way it would be a bit like side-tie bikini and front-tie_top

I would support the use of "ring_bikini" to describe swimsuits using rings in either the top or bottom portions of the swimsuit. Or maybe we should use "ring_swimsuit" to cover all types?

Furthermore, since the rings used in such garments are sometimes oval or rectangular, we could probably dispense with the "o-"...

I switched over to "o-ring_top" because, A) most do have a circular rings and B) not all images of tops with these rings are going to be swimsuits thus I wanted to get rid of that association, as it is unnecessary. While we could get rid of the "o", my goal is to have a broader tag not restrained with an association and specialization to swimsuit.

NWF_Renim said:
I switched over to "o-ring_top" because, A) most do have a circular rings and B) not all images of tops with these rings are going to be swimsuits thus I wanted to get rid of that association, as it is unnecessary. While we could get rid of the "o", my goal is to have a broader tag not restrained with an association and specialization to swimsuit.

OK, fine, let's not limit this tag to swimsuits. But what about o-ring_bottoms?

And has the alias actually been invoked yet? When it is, somebody can update the wiki entries.

Aliased:
o-ring_bikini_top -> o-ring_top
ring_bikini -> o-ring_bikini

And we do need do something about bottoms, then. I guess o-ring_bottom can be used, though most will probably be in bikinis.

I have added or changed wiki entries for o-ring top and bottom. But since bikinis with this feature will doubtless also have a separate bikini tag, I wonder of the o-ring_bikini tag will become obsolete? (since one can easily search for the two terms "bikini o-ring_top" together)