Named Original Characters

Posted under General

I know some artists that like to name their original characters. I was just wondering whether or not to tag the names even if they only ever appear in the artist's illustrations.

Updated by a moderator

I don't see why not, especially if the character gets drawn a lot, whether by the artist himself or by other artists. I've done it for queen_anubis and darumako, among others.

However, unless you're absolutely sure of the character's name, it may be wise to bring it up on the forum or this thread just to get a solid name down.

cleartailcat said:
I was mainly wondering about Shiroganeusagi's 奈々仔. Just to be sure, would this be romanized as Nanashi?

Actually, I'd say "Nanako". ENAMDICT turns up 10 given names with 仔 in terminal position; 7 of them are read as "ko" and only 1 read is read as "shi". (Of course, the other two are "ne" and "yo", which just goes to show that name readings make no damn sense.)

And even if an artist hasn't given names for a character, if they are drawing the same one or ones over and over, they are worth tagging. Some artist (I forget who) had a couple of girls who drew a lot, so we tagged them as "Soandso's_<descriptor>_girl"

I'm not sure how artist's names are supposed to be split, apart from obvious surname/given name seperations etc. , but I've seen some obvious bunches (i.e. hangetsuakibarika among others). shiroganeusagi is technically two words, but I always found it simpler to romanize シロガネウサギ as one.

That's in English. Doesn't mean it's necessarily two words in Japanese. And given the source language's lack of spacing, you can't really point to any sort of precedent. Much like the concept of "adjective", the English concept of "word" fails when applied to a completely different language.

1