BUR #51856 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias centaur_with_centaur -> taur_with_taur
Utility alias for a tag I just created.
Posted under Tags
BUR #51856 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias centaur_with_centaur -> taur_with_taur
Utility alias for a tag I just created.
BUR #51858 has been rejected.
create alias taur_with_taur -> multiple_taurs
i think taur with taur is too specific and a more general tag would be more useful
related forum #394015
trapster77 said:
BUR #51858 has been rejected.
create alias taur_with_taur -> multiple_taurs
i think taur with taur is too specific and a more general tag would be more useful
related forum #394015
According to the wiki this tag is specifically for centaur/centaur sex, unlike multiple traps where sex isn't needed
trapster77 said:
i think taur with taur is too specific and a more general tag would be more useful
Though we will eventually need mermaid_on_mermaid, lamia_on_lamia, and harpy_on_harpy, they should all be separate tags, else it's too hard to search for your species fetish without seeing a bunch of junk
czernin said:
According to the wiki this tag is specifically for centaur/centaur sex, unlike multiple traps where sex isn't needed
LQ said:
Though we will eventually need mermaid_on_mermaid, lamia_on_lamia, and harpy_on_harpy, they should all be separate tags, else it's too hard to search for your species fetish without seeing a bunch of junk
i just think the priorities are wrong. if the x_on_x or x_with_x tag is made, that doesn't mean a multiple_x tag can't be made later to cover the sfw posts. but if you make a multiple x tag first, then if it's a tag that has very few posts to begin with, then you won't need an x on x tag later.
there's 67k traps compared to 6.7k taurs. literally 10x more. but if u search multiple_traps rating:e it's mostly trap on trap. maybe the other tags will be different but imo the first step is to make a multiple_x tag and then if there is too many threesome posts with a wrong third make an x on x subtag.
The bulk update request #51858 (forum #403482) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #51856 (forum #403471) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
