imply See-through_pantyhose

BUR #48974 has been rejected.

create implication see-through_pantyhose -> pantyhose
create implication see-through_pantyhose -> see-through_clothes

Missing implications.

Tangentially related: topic #33419

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #48974 (forum #391988) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This seems like an overused tag. (Almost) all pantyhoses are transparent, and yet there's a lot of stuff that shouldn't be tagged in this tag. Posts that apply should be moved into sheer_pantyhose, and the tag should probably be deprecated or aliased.