BUR #48356 has been rejected.
create implication image_in_thought_bubble -> thought_bubble
create implication image_in_speech_bubble -> speech_bubble
Images in a thing necessarily mean the thing exists.
Posted under Tags
BUR #48356 has been rejected.
create implication image_in_thought_bubble -> thought_bubble
create implication image_in_speech_bubble -> speech_bubble
Images in a thing necessarily mean the thing exists.
Ylimegirl said:
spoken_image as a tagname feels wrong.
But it matches stuff like spoken object and spoken scene, which these feel like redundant tags of.
BUR #48377 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
deprecate image_in_thought_bubble
deprecate image_in_speech_bubble
Besides those already mentioned above, these tags get used on all kind of stuff that we already have existing spoken_* tags for, such as spoken exclamation mark, spoken heart, spoken food, spoken character, spoken object and so on due to their ambiguity. I feel like it's better to deprecate these in favor of more specific spoken_* tags.
The bulk update request #48356 (forum #389649) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #48377 (forum #389758) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
nonamethanks said:
Some of these have detailed scenes in them, I don't know if we have a tag for that.
Spoken scene does exist.
The bulk update request #48377 (forum #389758) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
