BUR #45617 has been rejected.
create implication barefoot -> feet
I don't see any image where bare foot applies that feet wouldn't.
Posted under Tags
BUR #45617 has been rejected.
create implication barefoot -> feet
I don't see any image where bare foot applies that feet wouldn't.
HyphenSam said:
It's possible for a post to contain barefoot characters and not be "prominently displayed or detailed", quoting from the feet wiki.
post #9774637, post #9774729, post #9775318, for example
There's also multiple cases where a character can be seen barefoot but the feet are not prominent; post #9777769
The bulk update request #45617 (forum #376590) has been rejected by @Freshblink.