BUR #45404 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication star_sticker -> star_(symbol)
Missing implication
Posted under Tags
BUR #45404 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication star_sticker -> star_(symbol)
Missing implication
BUR #45446 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication star_sticker -> sticker
I failed to check for this when I made the first BUR, but the other implication is missing too.
BUR #45447 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication heart_sticker -> heart
create implication heart_sticker -> sticker
Looks there are a few potential implications from the *_sticker tags.
BUR #45448 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication sticker_on_face -> sticker
create implication character_sticker -> sticker
create implication too_many_stickers -> sticker
Here's some more. Should sticker_sheet be here too? I don't totally understand if it's meant for sticker sheets as a medium or an object in the image.
BUR #45450 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update favgroup:46014 -> sticker_sheet_(object) -sticker_sheet
rename sticker_sheet -> sticker_sheet_(medium)
above
Kaleidoscoped said:
BUR #45450 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update favgroup:46014 -> sticker_sheet_(object) -sticker_sheet
rename sticker_sheet -> sticker_sheet_(medium)above
I like the idea, but should the names perhaps be sticker_sheet and sticker_sheet_(medium) in line with card and card_(medium)?
BUR #45763 has been rejected.
mass update sticker_sheet -favgroup:46014 -> sticker_sheet_(medium) -sticker_sheet
A slight tweak to the above BUR that leaves us with the tag names sticker sheet and sticker sheet (medium) in line with card and card (medium) / id card and id card (medium)
Some previous discussion on thing / thing_(medium) here: topic #32760
Kaleidoscoped said:
either way is fine by me. i suppose the _(object) qualifier would eliminate any ambiguity, though i don't know how much of an issue that would be in the context of sticker sheets in particular.
I agree that in isolation either is fine. I just slightly prefer this one because it lines up with a status quo we have, and because the default for an object to be tagged should be the object being in the image as it is with most objects, and defaults shouldn't be qualified unless necessary imo.
Maybe it is clearer and so therefore necessary though. We could alternatively change card to card_(object) and id_card to id_card_(object) and change tarot too. I'm trying to fix up playing_card and propose a playing_card_(medium) right now and I have noticed that it can be quite easy for people to misuse these tags. But then again people will put card_(medium) on something that should be tagged card fairly regularly too, so maybe it's just general mistagging noise and the tag is clear enough.
The bulk update request #45450 (forum #375832) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #45763 (forum #377041) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #45404 (forum #375632) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #45446 (forum #375827) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #45447 (forum #375828) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #45448 (forum #375829) has been approved by @nonamethanks.