Danbooru

Tag Implication: covering_breasts -> breasts

Posted under General

Fred whether the girl still has her clothes on should not hinder the tagging of her covering her breasts. It should be tagged as it looks.

Oh and in some cases it may be up to the user to tag images the way he or she believes proper. Make a whole new tag if you believe it is necessary.

Volaju said: Fred whether the girl still has her clothes on should not hinder the tagging of her covering her breasts. It should be tagged as it looks.

The issue is not whether covering_breasts is appropriate in that case, but whether breasts is appropriate.

An implication of 'x' to 'y' automatically applies 'y' in every case where 'x' is used, and in this case not every 'x' should necessarily have 'y' so I don't think we can do this implication.

Volaju said:
Fred whether the girl still has her clothes on should not hinder the tagging of her covering her breasts. It should be tagged as it looks.

Oh and in some cases it may be up to the user to tag images the way he or she believes proper. Make a whole new tag if you believe it is necessary.

Maybe you should take it easy and just lurk around for a few days before going around tagging stuff and giving people advice, yes?

You've only made 40 tag edits and already made some mistakes like adding from_behind instead of doggystyle in post #96458

Also, you better not create any new tags unless it's a new artist, copyright or character that doesn't have any pics on Danbooru. If that's not the case and you still think you should make one, you better ask here first before doing anything.

Fred1515 said:
Maybe you should take it easy and just lurk around for a few days before going around tagging stuff and giving people advice, yes?

You've only made 40 tag edits and already made some mistakes like adding from_behind instead of doggystyle in post #96458

Also, you better not create any new tags unless it's a new artist, copyright or character that doesn't have any pics on Danbooru. If that's not the case and you still think you should make one, you better ask here first before doing anything.

doggystyle = obviously taking it from behind. While many people look at these two as the same some only look for one. If they are both not tagged accordingly then they might miss the perfect one. Oh and controversial as may be, if it's tagged doggystyle it should also be tagged from_behind while not necessarily if it is tagged from_behind it should not always be tagged doggystyle.

I think if you looked those two tags up at the same time you would find that a wide variety of people agree with me, and that it was not just some fluke.

FYI: I came from gelbooru, pretty sure being anonymous there doesn't add to my tag count here.

スラッシュ said:
You should read the from_behind wiki.

Also, "other people also suck" is not a good argument to make.

what the bloody hell is this crap? when did we start tagging 'angles'? majority rules, most people think when they look for the tag from_behind that they are taking it from_behind. I mean we obviously don't have from_the_front or... from_the_sides now do we? so the logical explanation is that since people obviously can't take it from the side (unless your a guro fan) and there's no tag labeled from the front that it must be a sexual position and not an angle.

We have been doing it like that for as long as I've been here, and I suggest that you back your argument up with something other than "a lot of people are extremely stupid", cause it doesn't really help much. We have from_behind because it's a useful characteristic to identify a picture with. I wouldn't mind from_the_side if it weren't difficult to implement in practice, and from_the_front is the default state of affairs so it needs no tag.

On the other hand, I do agree that the tag name is somewhat ambiguous, and I regularly have to look it up to make sure that it is what I think it is--a suggestion for a better tag name wouldn't go amiss.

スラッシュ said:
I wouldn't mind from_the_side if it weren't difficult to implement in practice, and from_the_front is the default state of affairs so it needs no tag.

Unless I'm mistaken, the profile tag covers from_the_side in most cases.

Volaju said: what the bloody hell is this crap? when did we start tagging 'angles'?

Long before you came here. Also note from_above and from_below.

majority rules

No, no it doesn't. Rational discussion on the forums does. And if you can't offer that, then I only need to point out that I'm an admin and he's a mod and you're neither. So either learn to make proposals in a reasonable manner or expect not to be here very long.

Volaju said:
from_the_front or... from_the_sides now do we?

We do have from above and from below, fwiw. We also have profile, as eidolon mentioned.

Volaju said:
majority rules

Besides the fact that majority doesn't rule, you aren't even in the majority here, as this thread shows. Here at danbooru, you see, we basically don't give a fuck about the opinions of people who can't be bothered to participate in forum discussions. And of the people who are participating in this forum discussion, you are severely in the minority.

What I think you don't understand is that while danbooru has a lot of porn, the posts rated "safe" outnumber the posts rated "questionable" and the posts rated "explicit" combined. By a factor of almost 2. Therefore when there's an ambiguity in tag meaning between something that only makes sense in the context of porn and something that makes sense in any context, it's obvious that we should choose the latter. Just because you "have traversed the world of hentai/cartoon pornography" and are apparently interested only in that part of danbooru, it doesn't mean that our tagging system has to be bent to the sensibilities of your ilk.

EDIT: Ugh, jxh2154 beat me to much of this. Well, whatever. :)

1