Posted under Tags
There are 50 pages of results for :p open_mouth solo.
Talulah said:
There are 50 pages of results for :p open_mouth solo.
so what would the rewritten wiki for the tag look like?
Talulah said:
There are 50 pages of results for :p open_mouth solo.
Someone™ should clean them up.
But when the mouth is open like this post #6539734 is a incorrect use of :p?
Imagine_Breaker said:
But when the mouth is open like this post #6539734 is a incorrect use of :p?
Yes, that would be open_mouth tongue_out. But that has nothing to do with this implication request.
Don't think about the mistags like that but about where the tag is used correctly like post #2564290 or post #2888448 - these are not closed mouth.
Updated
skylightcrystal said:
If anything I'd say that :p and closed_mouth should be mutually exclusive. As the mouth has to be open a bit to let the tongue out.
Try doing it yourself. If you open your mouth, then it's just open_mouth tongue_out, not :p.
smowtenshi said:
Try doing it yourself. If you open your mouth, then it's just open_mouth tongue_out, not :p.
How are you sticking your tongue out of your mouth while keeping your lips together?
smowtenshi said:
Simply press your lips onto your tongue, I suppose.
Then that doesn't fit into the wiki of closed mouth. Which, given that the whole argument stems from the wiki for :p (which was only changed to include "closed mouth" as part of an edit which was in response to people taking issue with a clause saying that it should be when the character is smiling and had no discussion of closedness)...
If the lips are separated by the tongue then they are not together, any more than they would be if it were, say, a gag in between them instead. Or food. Or anything else.
And are you contending that the two things I linked to above should be tagged closed mouth despite the fact that they clearly aren't? Or that they should be removed from :p, despite the fact that it would render :p meaningless to exclude posts like them? One of these would be necessary if you want this implication to go ahead.
smowtenshi said:
Try doing it yourself. If you open your mouth, then it's just open_mouth tongue_out, not :p.
You are right, I was confused about :p
skylightcrystal said:
If anything I'd say that :p and closed_mouth should be mutually exclusive. As the mouth has to be open a bit to let the tongue out.
If you aren't gonna be tagging stuff like post #6621551 as closed mouth, there's a problem.
Unbreakable said:
If you aren't gonna be tagging stuff like post #6621551 as closed mouth, there's a problem.
Right, highly stylised images like that one may want both tags.
I was thinking of more realistic depictions. Which obviously means that they shouldn't be exclusive from each other on a site like danbooru - but I wasn't seriously proposing that it should be. Although I do think that excluding things like post #6621551 from the closed mouth tag would be less bad than this implication going through.
There being some overlap between tags doesn't mean that one have an implication to the other though.
Updated
skylightcrystal said:
If anything I'd say that :p and closed_mouth should be mutually exclusive. As the mouth has to be open a bit to let the tongue out.
I'd say it's mutually exclusive with open mouth, since, in danbooru terms, mouth is not open but parted. And since parted lips is for when you can visually see that the mouth is open a little, I'd use the tag that fits the most, which is closed mouth instead of anything else.
pronebone said:
I'd say it's mutually exclusive with open mouth, since, in danbooru terms, mouth is not open but parted. And since parted lips is for when you can visually see that the mouth is open a little, I'd use the tag that fits the most, which is closed mouth instead of anything else.
Why does it have to have one of the three? And plenty of things in :p fit your description of "parted lips" perfectly, including the ones I already posted.
Mayhem-Chan said:
I don't see the need to get stuck on the technicality of the tongue going between the lips to pretend :p technically isn't a closed mouth; For all intents and purposes, if it looks just like a closed mouth i don't see the issue with tagging it as such
Agreed. I don't think :P should exist, what with being able to simply search tongue_out closed_mouth, but said tag combination is absolutely valid.
I always tag :p as closed mouth, the mouth is pressed closed against a tongue that is sticking out of it. Parted lips is tongue out.
~:p ~:q open_mouth solo is mostly mistags, and the ones that aren’t boil down to a difference in opinion. Ideally, said 50 pages (7 on 200ct) could be addressed before the BUR.
edit: rewritten because I responded to an argument that only existed in my head
Updated
