Aliasing bad_aim -> cheek_poke.
Reason: same content, but bad_aim is a somewhat misleading tag name while cheek_poke is more accurately descriptive
Updated by Shinjidude
Posted under General
Aliasing bad_aim -> cheek_poke.
Reason: same content, but bad_aim is a somewhat misleading tag name while cheek_poke is more accurately descriptive
Updated by Shinjidude
Two of the images under bad_aim wouldn't belong under the cheek_poke tag. post #442693 and post #332585. Not that I think bad aim sounds like a good tag either though.
Frankly I don't care for the current use of the cheek_poke tag anyway, especially with the inclusion of images that poke the cheek from the inside like post #425945... it in my mind belongs under it's own tag, like cheek_bulge or something.
-1. Please stop killing all of danbooru's fun quirks. A more intuitive tag is not always a better one.
But even leaving that aside, cheek poke to me signifies someone poking someone else's cheek with a finger from the outside. bad aim at least actually describes the action depicted.
I vote to leave the tag as it is, and in fact edit the bad aim tag into many of the posts now tagged cheek poke.
And whatever you do, aliasing is not the solution. There is literally no possible argument that anyone could make claiming that bad aim is the same, semantically, as poking a cheek. At all.
Updated
What definition would you want for bad_aim then? It certainly seems like a tag that should have a definition down.
0xCCBA696 said:
But even leaving that aside, cheek poke to me signifies someone poking someone else's cheek with a finger from the outside.
That's what I always think when I see the tag. I think I saw perhaps just 1 image currently under the cheek_poke tag that involved a finger poking the cheek.