BUR #3493 has been approved by @evazion.
Show
create implication pokemon_battle_revolution -> pokemon_(game)
create implication pokemon_swsh_(anime) -> pokemon_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m01 -> pokemon_(classic_anime)
create implication pokemon_m02 -> pokemon_(classic_anime)
create implication pokemon_m03 -> pokemon_(classic_anime)
create implication pokemon_m04 -> pokemon_(classic_anime)
create implication pokemon_m05 -> pokemon_(classic_anime)
create implication pokemon_m06 -> pokemon_rse_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m07 -> pokemon_rse_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m08 -> pokemon_rse_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m09 -> pokemon_rse_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m10 -> pokemon_dppt_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m11 -> pokemon_dppt_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m12 -> pokemon_dppt_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m13 -> pokemon_dppt_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m14 -> pokemon_bw_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m15 -> pokemon_bw_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m16 -> pokemon_bw_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m17 -> pokemon_xy_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m18 -> pokemon_xy_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m19 -> pokemon_xy_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m20 -> pokemon_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m21 -> pokemon_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m22 -> pokemon_(anime)
create implication pokemon_m23 -> pokemon_(anime)
Pokemon implications. Movies 20, 21, and 23 buck the previous trend and are set in their own continuity, rather than the Sword and Shield one, hence the difference in implication. Movie 22 is a remake of the first movie, so there's probably an argument for it getting the (classic_anime) tag, but I'm playing it safe by implicating its parent instead.
EDIT: The bulk update request #3493 (forum #173111) has been approved by @evazion.
Updated by DanbooruBot