dark_skin and dark_skinned female

Hello

I noticed that dark_skinned_female is an alias for dark_skin. Personally, I don't think it should be this way because for example, maybe there's someone who wants to look at dark ladies, however when you type in dark_skin, half the page is white ladies being rammed by dark dicks. Perhaps dark_skin and darked_skinned_female should be seperate?

Thanks,

Mattias

Try dark_skin -rating:e, dark_skin -dark_penis or upgrade your account to use longer queries like dark_skin ~1girl ~multiple_girls -1boy -multiple_boys -rating:e.

See topic #11565

dark_skin -dark_skinned_male covers most use cases for dark skinned females.

you can also do dark_skin -dark_skinned_male, though the tag is underused so there might be some false positives.

nonamethanks said:

you can also do dark_skin -dark_skinned_male, though the tag is underused so there might be some false positives.

It certainly is under-tagged, yes. On that note, fans of dark ladies can consider helping out with fixing negligently-tagged images. Any amount of effort you can spare is a positive contribution!