Posted under Tags
I'll admit to being one of those people that tagged solo on posts with multiple views, so sorry about that.
Regarding the solo tag, does it count if there's only one character but there are non-character animals present as well? For example, on post #2902749 I left out the solo tag as there is a bat present.
Blue_Stuff said:
Regarding the solo tag, does it count if there's only one character but there are non-character animals present as well? For example, on post #2902749 I left out the solo tag as there is a bat present.
The solo tag is fine in those pictures as long as it's not a copyrighted/original "animal" or a creature like a pokemon, or if the animal's not the focus of the picture. Bats/birds like that don't count towards the character count.
Non-humanoids should never count towards xboys/xgirls, but I'm not sure if we have a rule on whether specifically-named creatures disqualifies a post from solo or not. I haven't been sure but tend to leave "solo" off in cases like that (post #1508003) That would be something to discuss if we haven't yet.
Updated
There does seem a good deal of uncertainty on this.
For instance a search for "shimakaze_(kantai_collection) rensouhou-chan 1girl -cosplay -1boy -multiple_boys solo" returns 64 pages, whereas "shimakaze_(kantai_collection) rensouhou-chan 1girl -cosplay -1boy -multiple_boys -solo" returns 65 pages. Almost a perfect 50:50 split.
edit: fixed a } to )
Updated
kuuderes_shadow said:
There does seem a good deal of uncertainty on this.
For instance a search for "shimakaze_(kantai_collection} rensouhou-chan 1girl -cosplay -1boy -multiple_boys solo" returns 64 pages, whereas "shimakaze_(kantai_collection} rensouhou-chan 1girl -cosplay -1boy -multiple_boys -solo" returns 65 pages. Almost a perfect 50:50 split.
Since he(?) is a character, has a tag and can move on his own I've been removing the solo tag from posts with only him and Shimakaze, same with Rensouhou-kun with Amatsukaze and Nishikitaitei-chan with Akitsushima.
This tags gets often added to posts that already have a source. Don't add this tag when you get this from a 1st party source (i.e. from the artist#s pixiv etc.).
Instead use topic #8199 and ask there and if you then get a name one should reate an artist page: howto:artist.
Chiera said:
This tags gets often added to posts that already have a source. Don't add this tag when you get this from a 1st party source (i.e. from the artist#s pixiv etc.).
Instead use topic #8199 and ask there and if you then get a name one should reate an artist page: howto:artist.
<soapbox>
There should really be two artist request tags. The original for genuine requests, and then a modified i'm_too_lazy_to_properly_tag_this_artist for pictures with first-party sources like Chiera said. To those that say that determining a proper artist name can be hard, well I say that I would much rather prefer even a generic artist identifier like pixiv125552, seiga5523, etc. that can always be changed at a later time rather than nothing at all. At least then all future uploads for that first party source will be collated under one tag instead of having to be somehow found and collected together after the fact.
</soapbox>
EB said:
Are there examples of black wings that are neither feathered nor demon/bat wings? Saying they have to be feathered seems like it could be too restrictive when you could just add feathered wings on top of it.
There's post #2659289, for one. Imposing a restriction like this on a color tag seems unnecessary to me as well.
iridescent_slime said:
There's post #2659289, for one. Imposing a restriction like this on a color tag seems unnecessary to me as well.
Jup.
Color tags can apply to everything. The color doesn't give any indication about wing type we have, although there is a lot overlap of black_wings demon_wings and white_wings angel_wings.
evazion said:
- succubus: Supposedly this tag is for when a character is engaged in succubus-like behavior. In reality this tag is used interchangeably with demon girl.
Doesn't help that the tag's definition is in the middle of boring text. It should be put at the start in bold.
The demon, demon girl and demon boy tags are in need of cleaning and better definitions. If I wanted to find some thing like post #2763670 I have to dig through quite a lot of stuff like post #2841027.
armpits and armpit_peek. due to recent mistagging, the latter is slowly becoming a duplicate of the former. it would be best to indicate that the latter is like an extension of panty_peek and pubic_hair_peek versions where their wikis a bit more deliberate.
^After clearing up a single set where the uploader added the tags for the first image in the set and then copied them over to every later image regardless of relevance, most of the recent stuff in armpit peek seem to fit one of the two uses of the tag.
Could somebody explain why the following posts are taged with demon.
post #2801171
post #2581152
post #2843085 I dont think those things are horns.
Can I remove the demon boy/girl tag if horns are the only thing suggesting they are demons? Example post #2841027 and post #2864743 (oni mask already tagged).
