Danbooru

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

iridescent_slime said:

I spent some time exploring different terms that could mean the same thing, but no luck. There doesn't appear to be another tag for this, even though it's a quite taggable concept and probably a lot more common than the number of posts suggests.

Interestingly, it turns out that there's also a matching underwear tag. I'm skeptical about the value of this one, since characters drawn in matched bra/panty sets seems to be the norm.

As we usually tag the exception rather than the norm the first tag is better to keep while nuking the second one.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Blue_Stuff said:

I have a question about the the following posts: post #3006864, post #3006865, post #3006866, and post #3006867.

The comic that they are a part of is about Suwako seemingly getting pregnant. As such, all of the posts in the pool before post #3006864 were tagged with pregnant. However, post #3006864 revealed that Suwako wasn't pregnant at all. My question is should post #3006864 and all of the following posts still be tagged with pregnant?

Tag what you see. Even in a comic.

Updated by DanbooruBot

worldendDominator said:

post #3031054
Top looks like a t-shirt, bottom looks like a one-piece swimsuit. What is that?

It's a one-piece swimsuit with short sleeves. It's a real style, but AFAIK there's no special name for it.

90sAnimeFan said:

Are those decorative shapes on the edges of the bra and the panties called frills or something else? post #3031290

Lace, not frills. You had it right with lace-trimmed bra.

Updated by DanbooruBot

For a character who is default monster person/monster/furry/etc., but was originally human, what tag should be used for their human form? humanization is a potentially inaccurate term given the canon circumstances, but should it be used regardless or should a different tag be used in those cases?

Updated by DanbooruBot

EB said:

For a character who is default monster person/monster/furry/etc., but was originally human, what tag should be used for their human form? humanization is a potentially inaccurate term given the canon circumstances, but should it be used regardless or should a different tag be used in those cases?

If the original human form appeared in canon or is otherwise well established, it can have a separate tag - for example, we have saigyouji_yuyuko_(living). If it's just an artist's interpretation, then humanization is fine.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Regarding pool #7966
Can anyone familiar with little witch academia checking post #2729209 and post #2723243? Are they really her "Past Self" or just her younger version?

_____________________

worldendDominator said:

post #3031054
Also, how do I tag an artist drawing a distinctive outfit made by another artist (post #2792465)? I used borrowed_garments, but its description is about something different.

borrowed_design?

Updated by DanbooruBot

Who are these Pokémon?

In post #3028528.

1- That Pokémon at the top, close to Sandshrew, Rufflet and Drifloon. That Pokémon is a circle with spikes, has yellow eyes, wears a headband, is located closest to the large word "GUILD".

2- That Pokémon at the stage, talking to Dratini. It has a black body and yellow eyes.

Updated by DanbooruBot