Danbooru

Stance on uploading patreon images?

Posted under General

Mikaeri said:

I'm neither for or against the presence of patreon reward. I understand it might be a sort of 'symbolic' metatag, but there's also issues with having it around -- the whole 'painting a target on ourselves' thing comes to mind. Albeit if there's going to be some sort of intermediate screen (tentative) linking to their patreon, I imagine there would need some sort of tag like it in place so such a feature would work properly?

Problem with patreon_reward is there's no layer of authentication with the tag. Other metatags such as bad_id or pixiv_sample you could easily build scripts to automate it since it's traceable, but patreon_reward relies on manual tagging, which isn't reliable if uploaders are getting them from sources outside Patreon or they're ignorant of the tag's existence.

Kerasu said:

I am sure this can be done through some form of metadata as opposed to a tag, but if the tag exists to support this feature I would not object to it.

A tag would be easier to support. Extra metadata translates to extra entries in the database, and the posts table is already bloated as is. Additionally, there would need to be additional user interfaces to control such data.

In contrast, different styles can be applied based upon the existence of a tag, which is already being done in the moderation queue. Additionally, it would require no extra user interfaces to manage, as it would be added/removed like a tag (maybe only allowed for post approvers).

BrokenEagle98 said:

A tag would be easier to support. Extra metadata translates to extra entries in the database, and the posts table is already bloated as is. Additionally, there would need to be additional user interfaces to control such data.

In contrast, different styles can be applied based upon the existence of a tag, which is already being done in the moderation queue. Additionally, it would require no extra user interfaces to manage, as it would be added/removed like a tag (maybe only allowed for post approvers).

The reasoning is sound, I have no objections.

Hillside_Moose said:

Problem with patreon_reward is there's no layer of authentication with the tag. Other metatags such as bad_id or pixiv_sample you could easily build scripts to automate it since it's traceable, but patreon_reward relies on manual tagging, which isn't reliable if uploaders are getting them from sources outside Patreon or they're ignorant of the tag's existence.

I suppose that's always a problem for tags that indicate that kind of information as such. Although there are +'s to making it metadata-based (altering the post table), it seems... prohibitively expensive to change. And then there comes the question of how it'd be applied -- can only approvers checkmark posts as Patreon/Enty/Fantia/Fanbox exclusive? Or can anyone? The latter would basically reduce its usefulness to a tag, but the former means more work for us. There's no sort of script that can detect a patreon reward, especially when those posts are coming from an outside source -- our knowledge of a post only comes from the uploader himself/herself. We already have somewhat restrictive approval standards on unsourced posts and source request not tagged (although a number of approvers will simply choose to ignore it).

In any case, if the tag is just plain easier to adopt, and is required for such a feature, then I'm for that instead. We can always issue action against users that abuse it anyway. Perhaps we might even treat it the same way as we do the loli and shota tags, prevent Member-level users from editing the tag out to make such a post "visible" or what not.

Mikaeri said:

In any case, if the tag is just plain easier to adopt, and is required for such a feature, then I'm for that instead. We can always issue action against users that abuse it anyway. Perhaps we might even treat it the same way as we do the loli and shota tags, prevent Member-level users from editing the tag out to make such a post "visible" or what not.

I'm in favor for the above... it favors the common-case while not restricting it so much that it puts an undue burden on a few.

Before we get bogged down on the details and technicalities of the proposed solutions, shouldn't we settle on how we'll resolve this situation first?

Kerasu/Ricegnat has been very understanding and willing to work with us on this issue, but we still have his Patreon-exclusive stuff posted up and available to all, despite him asking us very politely to take them down.

I feel like we're being a little dickish here, guys.

Fred1515 said:

Before we get bogged down on the details and technicalities of the proposed solutions, shouldn't we settle on how we'll resolve this situation first?

Kerasu/Ricegnat has been very understanding and willing to work with us on this issue, but we still have his Patreon-exclusive stuff posted up and available to all, despite him asking us very politely to take them down.

I feel like we're being a little dickish here, guys.

Meh, I'll 'soft' ban them for now (even though we don't have proof yet) since soft bans are always reversible. But again, that's something that albert has to take care of, and I don't know if Kerasu/ricegnat has already PM'd him.

EDIT: That all said, I don't know if I'm exacerbating the problem by banning that conte, since ricegnat already knows that his content is now pretty much "paywalled". But it's better than just having it out in the open (although the repost bots will always get it).

Updated

Mikaeri said:

Meh, I'll 'soft' ban them for now (even though we don't have proof yet) since soft bans are always reversible. But again, that's something that albert has to take care of, and I don't know if Kerasu/ricegnat has already PM'd him.

I've just done so. The soft ban is ok in the meantime, thanks for that. Though you missed one that was for some reason not tagged.

Kerasu said:

I've just done so. The soft ban is ok in the meantime, thanks for that. Though you missed one that was for some reason not tagged.

I've banned it. Also I'm also againist the idea of using such tags that promotes people to flock on site for free content for paid products such as patreon rewards. By not using that said that we will be limiting to access to those rewards at the very least. I also know that there are plently of other patreon rewards uploaded on the site which has still not tagged like that such as this work by Dante. There are a lot of posts still existed like that if we did back old uploads but what I'm trying to say is that people didn't even cared if these uploads were paid content or not until that tag came out of surface. Mind you after the emergence of this tag the more patreon rewards has been started to be uploaded on the site. So I highly suggest the removal of this sort of incentive tags that would hurt the sales of artist here who have patreon pages and promote people to upload patreon rewards here.

I really just hoping that we have a stricter rule towards Patreon uploads or in extreme case, making them as forbidden content to be uploaded. This is what happened for overextending Patreon uploads in past few months.

I am for nuking such a tag for those reasons, but yet I also realize that sometimes that meta-information is important in the case we have to do some cleanup due to a stricter application of rules regarding that kind of content. As albert has said, there is definitely the possibility in the future to make these sorts of works harder to access (intermediate page, not displaying thumbnails/previews, whatever), but if we want to make that possible, the information has to be somewhere there to begin with -- whether it's either through a change in the post table or through a tag like we do right now.

Regarding rules... well, as I'm aware, sayori's fanbox content is regularly updated here, and it would be, perhaps, unfair or unjustified if we were to only ban the kind of content that only comes from one site or one source (it shows preference). NNescio seems to have expressed that in some form (forum #103314). If we take action against just patreon rewards, it feels like it would only be fair we also have a tag like fanbox_reward or enty reward/fantia reward in the case other artists approach us about that. Alternatively, we could just make a blanket tag... but... ehh.

Truth be told, there's tons any one of the uploaders could do to put this site in legal jeopardy while still uploading quality content, and the only reason we have a restriction on not uploading manga in the ToS (at least, that I'm aware of) is so that people don't get the stuffy idea to upload rips from actual, mainstream manga. But there's always some form of rulebending going on -- I've seen some actual pages from prison school uploaded here, for example.

The nature of our site always puts us in a grey zone, that may never change. But I think there are of course, limits. Of course, artists are pretty powerless to pursue legal action (or at least, most of them are), but it starts getting real fuzzy if we start approaching in on any big publisher that actually does give a huge shit about content being ripped and posted here. I understand that's a different topic altogether though, so I'll stop providing further opinion about it.

Mikaeri said:

Regarding rules... well, as I'm aware, sayori's fanbox content is regularly updated here, and it would be, perhaps, unfair or unjustified if we were to only ban the kind of content that only comes from one site or one source (it shows preference). NNescio seems to have expressed that in some form (forum #103314). If we take action against just patreon rewards, it feels like it would only be fair we also have a tag like fanbox_reward or enty reward/fantia reward in the case other artists approach us about that. Alternatively, we could just make a blanket tag... but... ehh.

Truth be told, there's tons any one of the uploaders could do to put this site in legal jeopardy while still uploading quality content, and the only reason we have a restriction on not uploading manga in the ToS (at least, that I'm aware of) is so that people don't get the stuffy idea to upload rips from actual, mainstream manga. But there's always some form of rulebending going on -- I've seen some actual pages from prison school uploaded here, for example.

The nature of our site always puts us in a grey zone, that may never change. But I think there are of course, limits. Of course, artists are pretty powerless to pursue legal action (or at least, most of them are), but it starts getting real fuzzy if we start approaching in on any big publisher that actually does give a huge shit about content being ripped and posted here. I understand that's a different topic altogether though, so I'll stop providing further opinion about it.

I don't think Patreon is special in this matter, content from other similar services like enty or fanbox should be treated the same way. As the one that's most familiar to English speakers, I just use "Patreon" as a simple way to refer to them all.

Danbooru exists in a grey zone much in the same way that artists who draw (and/or sell) fanart exist in a grey zone. We are able to draw and sell fanart purely on the good graces of the publishers, and the simple fact that it's not practical nor beneficial for them to pursue each and every artist. So as an artist who does make money off fanart, I think it's wise to keep this in mind and not get ahead of ourselves (like a certain T-shirt company).

Similarly, as long as Danbooru makes the effort to show they do not intend to harm artists, I'm willing to bet it'll improve relations between artists and the site. Not every artist of course, but a good amount for sure.

I agree with a lot of the points Mikaeri brings up, so it would be cool to move in that direction.

Qpax said:

I say this as a fellow approver/gallery gardener, but you do realize that whether or not the tag exists, people are still going to repost the content here, right? Since patreon rewards from popular artists usually go well beyond what qualifies as acceptable, and they're the type of content many users like. And, as Hillside Moose said before, we can only trust other users if not the uploader to ensure that it is indeed a patreon reward, not some heavily modified/redrawn third-party derivative work.

I'd back tapnek's suggestion maybe 30-50% to make it Builder+, but keep in mind that there are only about 600 Builders on this site total, and about maybe 60-80 of them are routinely active every week to do this sort of gardening. On the other hand, there are about 6200+ Gold+ members, many of whom are promoted through either a monetary upgrade or through contribution (such as feline lump's recent promotion). The less work that any one of us have to do, the easier it is. And also not to mention -- paid users already have an incentive not to mess up stuff on their account (given the possibility for a warning/ban).

Kerasu said:

I don't think Patreon is special in this matter, content from other similar services like enty or fanbox should be treated the same way. As the one that's most familiar to English speakers, I just use "Patreon" as a simple way to refer to them all.

Danbooru exists in a grey zone much in the same way that artists who draw (and/or sell) fanart exist in a grey zone. We are able to draw and sell fanart purely on the good graces of the publishers, and the simple fact that it's not practical nor beneficial for them to pursue each and every artist. So as an artist who does make money off fanart, I think it's wise to keep this in mind and not get ahead of ourselves (like a certain T-shirt company).

Similarly, as long as Danbooru makes the effort to show they do not intend to harm artists, I'm willing to bet it'll improve relations between artists and the site. Not every artist of course, but a good amount for sure.

I agree with a lot of the points Mikaeri brings up, so it would be cool to move in that direction.

Yup. I include them too because, well, there's a handful of very popular Japanese artists that publish their highres work on enty/fantia/fanbox: n.g., sayori as mentioned before, nanahime, komeshiro kasu, kanzaki muyu, the list goes on. Part of the reason why we're sometimes allowed to get away with "removing" content like this is that there's enough of a technical/language/access barrier keeping the East Asian, non-English-speaking artists from pushing it any further. The honest thing to do would be to just contact them and let them know, but no sane uploader would do that -- it would instead be left to volunteer English-speaking users that want to see this site have a more difficult time, in the name of integrity and to increase the number of banned artists.

It's helpful though, to have an English-speaking artist that understands how this site works well contribute their thoughts to this discussion (and not to mention a notable artist with serious leverage). As I mentioned before, we're only curators -- we can't speak on the behalf of other artists unless they come out here and do so themselves. If there are any other users that you can think of to further 'pressure' action to be taken, then I think the site's relationship with other artists will definitely improve for the better.

----

As much as I do understand the argument that this site is primarily for fans, and that there won't really be any 'end' to making patreon rewards truly non-uploadable, the best we can do is at least support the artist as much as we can, and if not that, then at least make the content harder to access (even if this sort of pushes the 'paywall' narrative). We can make it harder for repost bots to get those exclusive works by perhaps changing the way uploads work, for example (as Gelbooru and Sankaku have bots that frequently repost content from here).

I think as Danbooru we are perhaps the friendliest site to artists (as we do regularly maintain a banned artist list and we constantly place emphasis on always sourcing a work properly from the artist page whenever possible, not from some third-party site). I'd love for that relationship to continue, but this is a somewhat difficult hurdle.

Basically the only reason I only ever started curating here is because I wanted art I liked to be preserved somewhere where others can find it easier and to support the artists I like. Yes, I do browse obtuse sources and I even have special scripts/tools to extract higher-res images or to bypass DRM on some reader sites -- but I have always kept what I have uploaded here public. That is, if it isn't typically paywalled or licensed content, I share it here in hopes that other users find the candy trail. I have even made the trek through old blog feeds or archives (such as ragho no erika's or karutamo's) to find higher-res works of theirs, at grueling effort.

What I've learned being a pixiv-er for nearly 3 years and one of the main curators here for a mere 3/4's of a year, is that some artists will always find trouble as a result of their work being posted elsewhere. Some of them just don't like the feeling that all their work, old and new, is basically put on record practically permanently on the internet as long as this site is up. Others get irate even as we regularly source the post back to them (whether it's booru, tumblr, twitter) because they think we're 'stealing' exposure from them or something like. There's no helping it, but I think what most of them do appreciate is the fact that their work is liked enough that it does make it to the other side of the internet through a user from another side of the world. I don't think Japan has anything like a "danbooru", and instead Japanese users go here to find content also, even if they don't exactly understand all of the site's workings.

EDIT: I words.

Updated

If there's going to be a tag for patreon rewards, there should definitely be tags for all paid content. This would, amongst other things, enable those like myself who think it wrong to have these images are on the site at all to stick the tags in their blacklists (like I already have with status:banned).

It could also potentially be put on the default blacklist, thus making it so the only people who see the stuff are those unscrupulous enough to go out of their way to get access to it. This would definitely make things harder to access, and more than most regular contributors here realise. Most casual users probably don't even know about the blacklist...

Things get a bit more awkward when it comes to stuff with physical releases rather than behind paywalls. For instance, a lot of novel illustrations are made freely available, while others (especially the greyscale ones during the novel*) are not. Likewise, some magazines will upload a few pages (which may well also be the ones that are hosted on the site) as previews to encourage people to buy the magazine. Such things are usually not used as the source, especially when pages are uploaded in bulk, but they still exist.
It could be quite difficult at times to work out what actually is content that is (or was, as sometimes it's only freely available for a limited time) content that is only accessible from paid sources in such cases. So I was only actually thinking of images behind artists' online paywalls when I said that - out of practicality, rather than on a basis of what is right to do.

*Though there are plenty of cases where these are freely available as well.

kuuderes_shadow said:

Things get a bit more awkward when it comes to stuff with physical releases rather than behind paywalls. For instance, a lot of novel illustrations are made freely available, while others (especially the greyscale ones during the novel*) are not. Likewise, some magazines will upload a few pages (which may well also be the ones that are hosted on the site) as previews to encourage people to buy the magazine. Such things are usually not used as the source, especially when pages are uploaded in bulk, but they still exist.
It could be quite difficult at times to work out what actually is content that is (or was, as sometimes it's only freely available for a limited time) content that is only accessible from paid sources in such cases. So I was only actually thinking of images behind artists' online paywalls when I said that - out of practicality, rather than on a basis of what is right to do.

*Though there are plenty of cases where these are freely available as well.

Specifically for digital rewards, I think it's reasonable to rely on the community to identify it, as much of the tagging already does. If the content was uploaded in the first place, it's likely that someone (if not the uploader) will be able to identify it as a paid reward.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7