Why is Drum scared of Mizuho? Shouldn't it be the other way around?
Submarines are always hot shit until you can actually see them. In this case Drum is just really nervous since she's incredibly exposed and hoping that Mizuho doesn't hold a grudge.
If I recall as was shown with one of their previous works the general drawing is done by the AI and then heavily cleaned up on details, such as the joints, hair, etc. Though I imagine the difference in her arm widths is an AI hiccup. The arm on the left is practically a twig compared to the arm on the right.
He's not so much redrawing as img2imging it, both the 'prototype' as shown in comment #2389521 (link now expired though) and the final image were clearly artefacted in different areas. The entire picture changed, including stuff that didn't require correcting at all like the BG, which indicates either an img2img of the whole thing or generation from the same seed on different settings. NAI v3 is too good at high tag count details like doll joints and doesn't really need manual refining in this regard. This one has a lot of issues as well, like the jacket breaking in half behind her back, hair strands appearing from nowhere under her left arm, and hair blending with mattress.
When you click on the Fantia thumbnail, you see the 800 x 1130 size. It is not the full size. You have to click on the blue button (It's to the left of the black "close image" button.) which is marked in Japanese as "original size", 1254 x 1771 in this example and then save the image.
When you click on the Fantia thumbnail, you see the 800 x 1130 size. It is not the full size. You have to click on the blue button (It's to the left of the black "close image" button.) which is marked in Japanese as "original size", 1254 x 1771 in this example and then save the image.
If the other post is a sample from the same source then you could have just requested a replacement in topic #16765 instead of one upping it.
My point was to show how to get the original size from Fantia to those who don't know, not "one upping" it. I wasn't aware it fell under a "replacement" rule.
