The girl on the left looking at the "camera" DESTROYS what could've been a good image. Pisses me off that so many artists pull this crap. Such a waste of a good image. If only I had any photoshop proficiency.
Where would you have her look instead? In the other girl's eyes? Then it would just be boring lesbian porn, for lesbians. The point here is that they're getting naked in front of you, the man, and you're going to put your penis inside both of them, at the same time. That's Tony.
Couldn't agree more with the whole girl looking at the "camera" comment, not that Tony's work isn't amazing, but look at the girl with the silver hair and her orgasmic look as she makes out with another girl, then look at the brunette, she doesn't look into it at all, which makes it kinda bleh.
fuckin you're all weird and too picky, the shit's hot, I'm a girl maybe that makes a difference but damn how is looking he "camera" in the eyes any bad?! ITS LIKE SHES LOOKING AT YOU I like that, plus T.T. is just an amazing artist.
I think he's showing her face because it helps the art composition. I mean, I'd rather have her making out passionately too, but you guys care a little too much.
LaC said: Where would you have her look instead? In the other girl's eyes? Then it would just be boring lesbian porn, for lesbians. The point here is that they're getting naked in front of you, the man, and you're going to put your penis inside both of them, at the same time. That's Tony.
NO! The fact that she's looking at the viewer is what makes it simaler to porn. If they're looking at each other's eyes, then it gives the picture a story: "They're Married, They're engaged, they're girlfriends, they're high on exstacy--" Any one of those! It gives the characters some sort of history, eye contact is the difference between porn and a story! If she looks at the viewer for even a second, then there's no history.