It was debated elsewhere, and the consensus was to follow Western convention by calling her Tosa-class as one that launched, rather than as Kaga (the Japanese way, as they don't care when the ship is launched and keep the class name for the first hull).
It was debated elsewhere, and the consensus was to follow Western convention by calling her Tosa-class as one that launched, rather than as Kaga (the Japanese way, as they don't care when the ship is launched and keep the class name for the first hull).
Tosa did exist, though, and was a different hull built in a different shipyard. Regardless of what you call the class, they were two entirely separate entities.
Tosa did exist, though, and was a different hull built in a different shipyard. Regardless of what you call the class, they were two entirely separate entities.
Bring it up in the forums then. The original debate was done when the original banned uploads. The Japanese call her Kaga, but Western powers insist the battleship version of our Kaga is Tosa-class even if the hull was different.
It was debated elsewhere, and the consensus was to follow Western convention by calling her Tosa-class as one that launched, rather than as Kaga (the Japanese way, as they don't care when the ship is launched and keep the class name for the first hull).
Wouldn't we have to rename *every Kisaragi tag* as Mutsuki by that convention?
KAGA-SAAAAN!?Welcome back, Haruna.Kaga-san!?I wonder about that...Yes!Haruna is all right!Good grief... but we can call this case closed now, right...?Indeed...Are you all right?