shii said: heterosexual sex in the missionary position? what is this bullshit?
Setting your wrong observations on sexual positions aside, you clearly do not know the pleasures of being hugged by the legs and arms of a woman while you are having sex with her.
And? Who cares if shii has had sex or not? That sort of comment is acceptable if you at least make it fun, but the analytical tone just makes it sound like you know the pleasures of having a man's penis inside your rectum. Also, you spelled "incubus" wrong.
LaC said: And? Who cares if shii has had sex or not? That sort of comment is acceptable if you at least make it fun, but the analytical tone just makes it sound like you know the pleasures of having a man's penis inside your rectum. Also, you spelled "incubus" wrong.
I expressed that because I disagreed with Shii's comment on the picture, being that I do not consider the situation bullshit, but in fact pleasant. Even if other people have not had sex, many of these people could like this position and situation. I do not know those pleasures you talk me about, but I am not interested, thank you.
Also, you spelled "incubus" wrong.
I have made this on purpose since always. It is my nick.
Oh, I see now... you didn't get the reference. There's an inside joke about "Heterosexual sex in the missionary position" in certain circles; he wasn't serious.
Simply put, have you seen how much of Japan's H material is rape, bondage, tentacles/other monsters, etc.? Compared to the proportions of freaky shit in that, plain old consensual sex (some would add 'in the missionary position') is pretty far deviated from the "standard".