This image is displayed at 80% of its original size.
View original
Image samples have been disabled. If you find this to be too slow, you can turn samples back on in your profile settings.
This post belongs to a
parent post. Child posts are often minor variations of the parent post (
learn more).
Before commenting, read the how to comment guide.
makkun
1 year agoHow do you shoot with a chain bow? It's not even elastic.
eidolon
1 year agoBows don't work like that. A bow's power comes from it's limbs, not the string. In fact, it would be less effective if the string was elastic.
makkun
1 year agoThe limbs are made of steel. Now, explain that!
ashot02
1 year agoCort321
1 year agoSteel can bend too you know.
Or maybe it isn't steel but rather a carbon-fiber shell.
CinderBH
1 year agoI'd rather say, I hope she's a vampire or otherwise has supernatural strength, because that thing can't possibly be operated by human hands. The draw of the typical longbow already goes up to 150 lbs and requires no small amount of strength to be used properly. I can't even imagine the draw of a "chain bow".
That said, it's still a pretty damn cool weapon.
Aleander
1 year agoActually, I imagine that a 'chain bow' would be much easier to nock the arrows. Provided the frame of the bow is flexible enough, that could be a viable weapon.
Just, God forbid if the chain should snag your arm on the recoil.
Gollgagh
1 year agowhoops there goes my arm
Dr Fine Rolo
1 year agoThis is an awesome weapon for an awesome character.
DOCoSPADEo
1 year agoLmao, You guys made this picture even better with your logic.
Lord Enki
1 year agoAnd now imagine that trident and hammer
are the arrows.
escav
8 months agoYou mean they weren't to begin with?
Also, if the limbs weren't a complete solid but made up of smaller connected metals, that would give it enough elasticity and power to make it somewhat more viable. Compare one of those exercise coil bars to an iron pipe for better imagery.
aoi-hoshi
3 months agoWell, a bow's power comes not only from the elasticity of the limbs but also their weight. If you'll recall 'f=ma' from your high school physics class, it makes sense that whatever material has the best spring/mass ratio is what will be the most effective, as well as the obvious prerequisite that the material "springs" back.
For the limbs it can be argued that the way they're constructed and what they're made of could provide more force than wood along with a lighter weight, but the chain could easily be replaced with multiple flaxen bowstrings wound together to be more effective. Or just a chain with smaller, more weight/strength efficient links to retain the whole coolness factor of the weapon.