Loli/shota check thread.

post #239993

Am I missing something here?

shota rating:safe

I would've removed the shota tags but might as well post on this thread just to be safe.

bored man: I fixed Ayu's tag vandalism for you.

Two years ago kane182 got a swift ban for that kind of behavior, now I can't even leave a neg for it.

Link to the user's profile please.

http://danbooru.donmai.us/user/show/19932

Check my tag edit history if you want to see which posts I fixed. There was 4 or so shota rating:s by him.
edit: over a month old, though

Dalamar said:
bored man: I fixed Ayu's tag vandalism for you.

Two years ago kane182 got a swift ban for that kind of behavior, now I can't even leave a neg for it.

I wouldn't call adding the shota tag to those 3 posts "tag vandalism". They were all underage boys anyways, Ayu probably wasn't familiar with the Danbooru meaning of shota (explicit pics only).

The other edits he made (rating:s and all that) look perfectly fine, no reason to ban or give anyone a neg.

Unless of course he keeps tagging that way after someone explains it to him.

Yes, I just wish we could leave neutral records to serve as a public warning rather than having to pm 3 guys a day to say they're doing it wrong (which couldn't be proven you warned them by pm if they keep doing it).

I don't remember there ever being a feature for neutral records? I wouldn't be opposed to that as a feature, to be honest.

I don't think there ever was such a feature.

IIRC evazion came up with the idea in forum #29752.

It might be worth mentioning this in the Danbooru 2 thread.

post #324077

Definitely loli

Something is not running right here.
alright, there was a consensus the pic should be tagged loli, it was tagged, I can't see it.
But when I see comments on how it is NOT loli, and was UNtagged, I find the pic has been retaged as loli.
Someone is not caring for this discussion...

Which post are you talking about? I don't see anything from this thread from the last two pages or so that where the tag was removed by consensus and then reverted without discussion.

Sigfried666 said:
Something is not running right here.
alright, there was a consensus the pic should be tagged loli, it was tagged, I can't see it.
But when I see comments on how it is NOT loli, and was UNtagged, I find the pic has been retaged as loli.
Someone is not caring for this discussion...

When making posts like this, link to the goddamn image.

In addition to being shitty art, I'm fairly certain that post #614500 doesn't qualify as loli.

No, it's not loli. The misshapen breasts should be clue enough.

post #6687 doesn't seem fitting of the loli tag, and post #99176 is practically the same. Also check post #405889

Dogenzaka said:
post #405889

The other two weren't, but I'm on the fence on this one. Leaning no, but the face and slender build makes me question it.

I'm pretty sure that one warrants it, although her size sort of offsets it.

The length of the torso makes me think "not loli."