sgcdonmai is a trusted member of the community and understands danbooru policy on how to use the loli tag. Default to whatever he says unless someone else who has an account with a respectable reg date/member level presents a counterargument.
Posted under General
Calling post #592264 loli is a stretch in my opinion. Certainly it would not cross my mind to add "loli" if I were uploading it. I'm borderline on whether it should even be rating:q. Although, just that, borderline. Which means I'm not going to change it.
My concept of loli has always been less strict than some other people's. Probably up to around post #609974, and stopping a good bit short of post #592264. It's that area where a character is depicted as clearly no longer a "child" but not necessarily a full-blown "teenager" that has me erring on the side of not loli, while others will err on the side of loli. post #592264 doesn't depict a child, not in my eyes anyway.
FeKa said:
It is suggestive, so by the tag definition, it should be tagged as loli.
Now it's 3 vs 2. Anything else?
Suggestive to the point where it's NSFW. If it was based on being purely suggestive, then a picture of a loli handling a banana or a popsicle with her mouth in a certain way might qualify for the loli tag too. Discussing the image any further at this point though is equivalent to beating a dead horse so I'll move on.
Sorry to interrupt the conversation, I ran into something that seems like a paradox. Putting the whole moral argument aside, can loli have the happy_sex tag? Was looking at post #417159 and would seem to fall under the happy sex category, then started to wonder if a real loli could really comprehend the underlying idea?
Azalyn said:
Sorry to interrupt the conversation, I ran into something that seems like a paradox. Putting the whole moral argument aside, can loli have the happy_sex tag? Was looking at post #417159 and would seem to fall under the happy sex category, then started to wonder if a real loli could really comprehend the underlying idea?
Given that the loli tag can apply regardless of the age of the character in question, I would think so, and even then, girls can understand from a young age that it feels good when things are done to their genitals.
Azalyn said:
Was looking at post #417159 and would seem to fall under the happy sex category, then started to wonder if a real loli could really comprehend the underlying idea?
What Fencedude and shii said. You can't compare fictional beings to real beings. If you look at likely almost all anime series, underage characters don't act at all like real people. Anyways even if you do look at real people, you'll find that children aren't as innocent as everyone is trying to make them out to be. There are plenty of cases of very young children found stimulating themselves. It is a matter of development, and there are plenty where the feeling of doing such things wouldn't escape them. You're also forgetting that the age of puberty decreasing as well.
Anyways all that matters is what is fictional does not equal what is real.
I'm borderline about post #447116.
Dogenzaka said: I'm borderline about post #447116.
Not loli.
I feel sad now. Being a non-member, I can't even argue if umhyuk is exaggerating or not, not being able to see the pics he is tagging.
Not trying to whine much here, just reminding that the loli tag removes the pics from the public acess, meaning it is a bit egoistical to tag it freely.
post #256409 I'm inclined to say it is but I'd a like a second opinion.
reese said:
post #256409 I'm inclined to say it is but I'd a like a second opinion.
Yeah, more loli than not