hdk5 said:
Yes on that whole set
Posted under General
hdk5 said:
Yes on that whole set
post #7177834
The fact that the two inner girls have roughly the same height and build as the two non-loli outer girls except for the breasts makes them appear to be roughly the same age and leads me to believe they might be able to be classified as adolescent.
Hankpropaniac57 said:
I don't see anything that would qualify.
post #7182228 very un-loli to me imo
post #7182747 don't think it's quite loli idk
I tagged post #7184915 as shota/onii-shota. Or what do you think, is it just a size difference between a muscular male and a regular male?
90sAnimeFan said:
I tagged post #7184915 as shota/onii-shota. Or what do you think, is it just a size difference between a muscular male and a regular male?
That's just size difference.
post #6496481 looks adolescent
hdk5 said:
post #6457461 + set?
id:6457461,6457462,6457464,6457465,6457466 all don't look loli to me.
Edit: Looking at it again, if the only difference between this and the child post is a bit of convenient censoring and a lack of suggestive fluid, then it probably deserves the tag based on the presentation alone.
Updated
Kawakijin said:
Doesn't look loli to me
decided no but I might be wrong
c_spl said:
decided no but I might be wrong
Agreed. Not loli.
c_spl said:
decided no but I might be wrong
I agree as well, definitely not loli IMHO