Is there a reason a [[paraplegic]] tag doesn't exist?

Would paraplegic contradict some images, or be too subjective?
The blind tag for example; while viewers are aware of the characters condition, what if an artist decides different?

Some examples of paraplegic, please?

blind is often used for canonical blind characters. It's not something I necessarily agree with, since you can tag blind people by their cataracts, cane, seeing eye dog, etc., but I guess people like their blind moe.

I guess wheelchair already finds them all. Not having one in the image would require metaknowledge.

Edit: Schrobby beat me to it.

I think the blind tag needs a clean up. Danbooru has a policy of "tag what you see, not what you know". Unfortunately, this makes a tag like blind hard to judge as often canonically blind characters show no signs of being blind in the image (as people can do in real life). Things like obviously not making eye-contact, being oblivious to object 10cm in front of their faces, blacked-out glasses and guide-sticks should be the main thing to look for when tagging.

As for paraplegic, I assume you mean "people tied to a wheelchair due to a damaged spine"? In which case, most images under wheelchair will count, but outside of that, it's the same problem where you can't tell if someone is paraplegic or just sitting most of the time.

Hillside_Moose said:
Some examples of paraplegic, please?

Yeah, that is the standstill of what a viewer knows vs. what the character status is. Characters such as Nunnally Lamperouge or Shinomiya Ayase for example; not always draw in their chairs.

I guess the image would have to show some for of distress? (post #621314)
So I would agree with Serlo. Unless a no_wheelchair tag can be created.

bump

Just go with a wheelchair search. Anything else is going to be fanwank.

alright, I'll see how it works out.