Tag Implication: paint bucket -> bucket

Implicating paint bucket -> bucket.

Reason: The following tags also need to implicate bucket:

• bucket of water (also implicate water?)
• bucket on head (also implicate object on head)
• bucket spill (also implicate spill)

bucket_of_water -> water as well.

Anelaid said:
bucket_of_water -> water as well.

Not as sure about that one, since the water in said bucket might only be a small part of the image. The checkerboard_cookie -> checkered implication was turned down for a similar reason.

Also alias paint can and paintcan to paint bucket.

Evangeline_A.K._McDowell said:
Also alias paint can and paintcan to paint bucket.

Shouldn't that be reversed? Especially given that paint cans don't necessarily have to have handles. It's a common feature, but not all of them have it.

NWF_Renim said:
Shouldn't that be reversed? Especially given that paint cans don't necessarily have to have handles. It's a common feature, but not all of them have it.

I wasn't aware of a difference and was just going with the number of tags for each. But I'm used to calling them paint cans in the first place, so I'd be fine with the alias going that way.

NWF_Renim said:
Shouldn't that be reversed? Especially given that paint cans don't necessarily have to have handles. It's a common feature, but not all of them have it.

I don't have a problem with that particular alias going that way. If it does, I recommend implicating can instead of bucket.

can is almost entirely aluminum soda/beer scans so no to that.

Implicated:
bucket_of_water -> bucket
bucket_on_head -> bucket
bucket_on_head -> object_on_head
bucket_spill -> bucket
bucket_spill -> spill

I'm much more familiar with "paint can" as well but it may be a dialect thing. I'm not sure about implicating it to either can or bucket... seems different from both.