<Spoiler> F.E.A.R. character alias

alias: alma_wade -> alma_f.e.a.r.

reason: Although this is the same character, there are two big twists that occur in the final chapter of F.E.A.R. This is the biggest one since up until this point, it was not known what Alma was, regardless of who she was, and you literally find this out right before the game ends. While there are other games in the series, to my knowledge, they don't explicitly mention this since this information is only revealed to the player. So this is a pretty big spoiler, even though there's not that many tags using her character. There could be a blurb in the wiki about her full-name and identity.

Too short, use alma_(f.e.a.r.) instead.

There's a game and several other characters called "alma".

Urg... you're already spoiling it with the thread title. Please change it to <spoiler> f.e.a.r. character alias.

Fixed and fixed.

Spoilers in names cannot be aliased, they need to be edited. The reason: you don't want to see this spoiler in the wiki:

Character: alma_(f.e.a.r.)
The following are aliased to this tag: alma_wade

S1eth said: Spoilers in names cannot be aliased, they need to be edited. The reason: you don't want to see this spoiler in the wiki:

Character: alma_(f.e.a.r.)
The following are aliased to this tag: alma_wade

Yeah - that's a super useful feature generally but has an unintended and unfortunate side effect in these situations.

But yes, just an edit for alma_(f.e.a.r.) works here, since there are so few images.

jxh2154 said:
Yeah - that's a super useful feature generally but has an unintended and unfortunate side effect in these situations.

But yes, just an edit for alma_(f.e.a.r.) works here, since there are so few images.

Would it be worth requesting a functionality to create hidden aliases, for these cases, or would that create more issues?

Anelaid said: Would it be worth requesting a functionality to create hidden aliases, for these cases, or would that create more issues?

It'd be nice, sure, but it's a matter of whether these infrequent cases are worth albert's development time. ::shrugs::