Posted under General
Alright, but I would still like it to be renamed. Emoticon tags suck for a variety of reasons. How about calling it arms_raised? Or arms_outstretched?
And since you brought it up, the 'arms up and behind the head' pose should have its own tag. I've created arms_behind_head for it.
I guess if you really want to get rid of the emoticon, I'd support arms_raised, but that tag will require being decoupled from arms_up.
As for the arms_behind_head I could honestly have sworn that a tag for that concept existed at one point, though after seeing so many under arms_up perhaps it was removed or never caught on.
Now that I look, it turns out the tag is called hands_behind_head. I guess arms_behind_head should be aliased to it, or vice versa.
スラッシュ said:
A "variety of reasons" emoticon tags suck? I can't think of one, other than some weird lingual fetish.
@Log:
I guess I'm retarded. Do the arms have to be at an angle, just like in the emoticon, or can they be straight up, ran ran ruu style? If it's the former, why be so specific? They're both outstretched arms. Do we really need separate tags for slightly different angles? If it's the latter, why use an emoticon that doesn't even look like the action? It's misleading.
It could be a subset of arms up but unless you are going to insist on arms_outstretched_at_50_and_130_degrees as a tag you're just being stubborn. It's a really specific pose and just folding it into another tag is pretty dumb.
I can concede that it's not the easiest tag to find if you're trying to find it with no prior knowledge of it but that could be really easily remedied with some wiki work.
evazion said:
Alright, but I would still like it to be renamed. Emoticon tags suck for a variety of reasons. How about calling it arms_raised? Or arms_outstretched?
Could we please stop discussing it every week? I'm fine with implications, but emoticons for specific poses/expressions really have their place and the constant renaming proposals are getting very annoying.