Danbooru

Tag Alias: \o/ -> arms_up

Posted under General

I'd be more in favor of an implication. \o/ is very clearly the arms fully outstretched and risen upwards, it can be considered a specific pose. arms_up is extremely general, and includes anything with their arms risen up (and seems to be most commonly arm up and behind the head).

I'm against this because it's super specific and if you can't tell what it signifies immediately you may be retarded, whereas with a worded tag you would have to figure out exactly what it's supposed to be as opposed to the other 12 arm positional tags.

スラッシュ said:
A "variety of reasons" emoticon tags suck? I can't think of one, other than some weird lingual fetish.

  • They're often difficult to discover. My first instinct when searching for 'raising arms' is to search *arm*, then *raise*, *stretch*, etc. I would never think to search for \o/. The only way to discover this tag is by randomly stumbling across it while browsing, which is hard when it only has ~125 posts.
  • They usually don't depict the concept better than words do. \o/ looks like a person raising their arms in the same way that (.)(.) kinda-sorta looks like breasts. We obviously wouldn't use (.)(.) as the tag for breasts. Why then should we use \o/ for outstretched arms? The only time an emoticon should be preferred is when words don't suffice and the expression literally looks just like the emoticon. >_< and |_| qualify; :) and \o/ don't.
  • The site's formatting can fuck them up. Not really a concern here, but it is for tags like :d, where it completely changes the meaning, and >_<, where the underscore really is an underscore, not a space.

@Log:

I guess I'm retarded. Do the arms have to be at an angle, just like in the emoticon, or can they be straight up, ran ran ruu style? If it's the former, why be so specific? They're both outstretched arms. Do we really need separate tags for slightly different angles? If it's the latter, why use an emoticon that doesn't even look like the action? It's misleading.

It could be a subset of arms up but unless you are going to insist on arms_outstretched_at_50_and_130_degrees as a tag you're just being stubborn. It's a really specific pose and just folding it into another tag is pretty dumb.

I can concede that it's not the easiest tag to find if you're trying to find it with no prior knowledge of it but that could be really easily remedied with some wiki work.

evazion said:
Alright, but I would still like it to be renamed. Emoticon tags suck for a variety of reasons. How about calling it arms_raised? Or arms_outstretched?

Could we please stop discussing it every week? I'm fine with implications, but emoticons for specific poses/expressions really have their place and the constant renaming proposals are getting very annoying.

1