Tag implication: predicament_bondage -> bondage

Maybe it's not worth doing, since there are only about 50 images with predicament_bondage.

Done.

Thanks.

meatwagon said:
Maybe it's not worth doing, since there are only about 50 images with predicament_bondage.

Please wikilink the tags you discuss, like so: predicament_bondage. There's a DText formatting reference to the right when you're typing a post if you're not sure.

Will do. Sorry about that.

Also, it occurred to me that predicament_bondage ought to implicate bdsm, since this implication is absent from the main bondage tag. Actually, it's a huge mess, since we have most bondage pics lacking bdsm when they should have it, but then we also have tied_up, which is supposed to be non-sexual bondage. Or so I assume, since it has no wiki page.

I'd like to clean that up. IMHO, we should reserve bondage for the sexual thing, and implicate it to bdsm, then use tied_up for all the rest, and clarify the distinction in the wiki.

葉月 said: I'd like to clean that up. IMHO, we should reserve bondage for the sexual thing, and implicate it to bdsm, then use tied_up for all the rest, and clarify the distinction in the wiki.

Makes sense to me. I'll implicate bondage to bdsm now.